User talk:Deshppriya

August 2019
Hello, I'm Greyjoy. I noticed that you recently removed content from Genetic studies on Sri Lankan Tamils without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Grey joy talk 06:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Edits on Scientist
I have reverted your edits on the Scientist page again as they are unsourced, poorly written, and nonconstructive, just like your other edits on Wikipedia. I suggest you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (see WP:PG). And please do not re-revert (see WP:BRD). Instead, discuss the issue on the Scientist talk page (Talk:Scientist). I recommend that you come armed with reliable sources before doing so (see WP:RS and WP:V). And if you want to test out Wikipedia's features or your edits, try using your own personal sandbox (see H:SAND). danielkueh (talk) 05:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Scientist shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. danielkueh (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)