User talk:Deskana/Archive 11

Broly move
Seeing as no new comments have been added to the Broly > Broli move and that support wins out, Can Broly be moved to Broli now? DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 20:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call what you had a consensus. I don't think its a good idea. --Deskana (talk)  02:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well no one besides the ones that have already voiced their opinions have made any new comemnts to the discussion. The only oposers were a troublemaking Ip and a user who only belives the move shouldn't happen is because "Funimation Is official". If someone else objects the move then it can easily be reverted. DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 21:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Mind checking this out too?
User:I Always Win (note name) recently created an account a few days ago. Today he has been removing notes related to professional wrestling events in articles of arenas such as Staples Center and Los Angeles Memorial Sports Arena. He claims that these notes are not notable to the articles. However the consensus at WP:PW is that a note about major pro wrestling events should be made to the related venue article. When I refer this user to the consensus he goes out and files a report on me at the admin noticeboard/incidents. Now I believe the first step to resolve a dispute per Resolving disputes should have been a formal talk between the parties involved. Instead he just goes all out and reports me on the admin noticeboard. After he accused me of having an WP:OWN problem (hint, seems familiar) he was accused by two other users of being a sock. Now while I don't believe he is a sock of User:Chadbryant since I've never talked to him before, I do believe that he is a sock of the other User:JB196 meat puppets that you blocked about a week ago. He is a sock of someone. I doubt that new registered users automatically know about WP:OWN and the Admin noticeboard upon making their first edit. Please see the Admin noticeboard case here -- bullet  proof  3:16 23:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet?
To answer your question, no. Judging by the post above, I think the wrestling fans are having a hard time figuring out which of their adversaries to accuse me of being a sockpuppet of. I Always Win 04:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what Then you'd be very smart not to act like one. is supposed to mean. I edited a few articles and apparently stepped on the toes of a few wrestling fans, who then chose to play the "sockpuppet" card, as I've seen happen before I ever registered an account. It's clear that a "consensus" has been reached to include pro wrestling references in as many articles as possible, and there's no sense in wasting my time arguing with it and interfering with the real purpose of this project. I Always Win 04:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello. Speaking of sockpuppets, Recoome is still vandalizing my domain and making personal attacks. Please block that IP 219.89.176.57 and completely protect my talk page, as you did Recoome's, pretty please? I'll actually leave Wikipedia once you have done this. Power level (Dragon Ball) 17:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * First off, that "You have new messages" box continues to show up despite I already clicked onto my talkpage. Can you fully protect my alternate account Power level talk page and fully protect my IP, 66.229.120.240's user/talk pages since Recoome continues to disrupt me? I will not edit the Wikipedia once both accounts have been fully protected from editing. Please do this and fix that "You have new messages" box from showing up for no reason. Please, I beg of you. Please! I am sorry for before, I'm pratically enjoying my Smash Bros. forum enough to quit returning here. Please, again do me this favour of fully protecting and fix "You have new messages" box from always showing. Please. 66.229.120.240 16:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, 219.89.175.102 (Recoome's IP) is making a basless accusation by claiming Speed Air Man is my sockpuppet. I have already revealed who I am, who Power level is, and I think Recoome's IP block needs serious banning. He won't stop. Please do my request as said above. I beg of you. 66.229.120.240 16:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Last thing, this history page is offensive to the both of us. What should be done? 66.229.120.240 17:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no magic wand with which to fix bugs related to the appearance of the new messages bar. That is a bug in the MediaWiki software which the developers are not only aware of, but are actively trying to fix. It is a side effect of not editing with your account. If I spot more socks of Recoome being disruptive I will block them, but my patience is wearing thin with you, what with you being "retired" and all. If you're retired, you shouldn't be here and you shouldn't care. Otherwise, you're not retired. --Deskana (talk) 21:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Email
Just to let you know, I've sent you an email about the Manchester meet up, regards  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  11:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Sock puppetry
User:Black Rhino Ranger has admitted to making extra accounts to evade blocks on his other accounts (User:Snakezilla and User:Komodo lover) here. I've filed a report at WP:SSP here, but with his confession, I believe appropiate action can be taken immediately. Much appreciated. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 17:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Sean gorter/Signature shop
On the page he says to "not edit this page". Could you protect the page so no one will edit it, or should it be left alone? A•N•N•A  hi!  20:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Protect it, meaning he can't edit it either? No. For a few reasons.
 * He probably wants to be able to edit the page himself, otherwise he'd never have created it, so protecting it wouldn't be good common sense.
 * Technically speaking, according to the protection policy, the only time a user page can be protected unconditionally is if the page which that user corresponds to requests it.
 * I wouldn't protect it even if he requested it. I disagree with indiscriminate protection of user pages on a ideological level, regardless of what policy says.
 * --Deskana (talk) 21:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, I had a feeling he wasn't an administrator. Thanks for the advice. ;-) ANNAfoxlover 18:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

My sig
Just so you know, I'm trying to get some help with my long signature because of many administrators' complaints. You can see more details at User talk:Sean gorter/Signature shop. A•N•N•A  hi!  20:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:Cleanup
Oops. :p I knew I was forgetting something when I was running AWB! I guess it was because I was using this option I'd never used before, and I forgot about the simpler things. Oopsie, «  A NIMUM  »  21:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I still can't believe I would forget to change the summary! Oh well, I am mister procrastination. «  A NIMUM  »  21:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Review
Hey there Deskana. Thanks for the review. The sig has been changed. What do you think. Also I have my userpage as a transclusion for simplification. So where have I talked to you before? --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ )  02:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Fine but your bugging me up the wall about it. :) --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ )  02:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:Hersfold.jpg

 * Reply to 

The Starfleet logo. That part of the image was actually self-generated, so I don't think any license would apply? If you think otherwise, let me know and I can try to figure it out or have it deleted. Hersfold (talk/work) 01:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Dear, thank you for you efforts to build consensus on my RfA. As you know, it was unsuccessful. I am not the type of editor to be disheartened by such a result, and have gained much experience.

I will run again, however I am concerned that I may see your name in the same place, for the same reasons. I would greatly appreciate knowing what I could do to earn your support next time.

If you have anything to contribute by way of improvements or comments, please don’t hesitate to tell me. Kind regards, Dfrg.msc 00:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Java coding
I am only curious how I code like your Java lecturer. Is it indentation, my obsession with, condensing everything, ... :? Grace notes T § 00:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh no! You've found me out. :P Grace notes T § 01:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

There's a vandal that needs blocking...
He goes to my school and is a complete twat. His intelligence is zero so there's no way he could construct anything sensibly on Wikipedia even if he tried, and all he does is vandalise. His current user is:

User:Waveisback77788

And he is a sock puppet of User:Xanthereturns and User:Za. If it's possible, could you block both his user and IP address, and if it's possible block off any new usernames from being created using his IP address. I don't know what is and isn't possible for you admins, but I'd really appreciate it if you blocked off this retard. Thx.

Silver Fang 17:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Please report vandals to WP:AIV. ANNAfoxlover 19:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Gotcha.

Silver Fang 13:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Please delete
this page: User:ANNAfoxlover/Quotes I don't need it. ANNAfoxlover 20:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

how to keep a page from overloading with unhelpfull good faith edits
The page list of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy is being overrun with good faith fancruft. To minimise the amount of damage done, there are a plethoria of comments in the text (which are not in the best of style and civilty, I know, I'll go and change them next), yet to no avail. The following diff showing the last 7 edits shows how little actualy changes. By far most edits to the page are good faith fancruft, and reverts of those edits. I had requested semi-protection for the page, as the fancruft comes mostly from annons, but that was denied on the grounds of the edits being good faith. They are indeed good faith, but that doesn't mean they are usefull. Would you have any hints on what other ways I could try to get the page from being overrun? Martijn Hoekstra 20:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Kevin Danyelle Mitchell (football player)
Hi, I have a problem with moving a page. When I moved Kevin Mitchell (football player) → Kevin Danyelle Mitchell page, it instead moved to Kevin Danyelle Mitchell (football player). Then I went back and moved it again, It made a double redirect. Can you help me with this problem? Louis Alberto Guel 11:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes. By the way, you must have forgotten to remove the statement in brackets otherwise it would have moved correctly. Either way, I can fix it :-) --Deskana (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Louis Alberto Guel 16:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalizing
If I vandalize Uncyclopedia, then would I be a bad Wikipedian? ANNAfoxlover 23:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Why would you want to vandalize anything? Acalamari 23:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to know if I vandalized Uncyclopedia, would I be a bad Wikipedian? ANNAfoxlover 00:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Why would something you do at Uncyclopedia affect you here? I'm not sure if you can vandalize Uncyclopedia--<font face="comic sans ms"> $U IT  01:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I don't believe it'll affect you here, but why vandalize anyway? Acalamari 01:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What Acalamari said. Why bother vandalising? It's childish. --Deskana (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox
Are you allowed to make the Wikiepdia sandbox a redirect? ANNAfoxlover 16:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Why would you want to? --Deskana (talk) 19:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't say I wanted to. I just saw someone else do it and I wondered if I should tell them something. ANNAfoxlover 20:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete
Can you delete page User:Louis Alberto Guel/Raider Message, I don't need it anymore. --Louis Alberto Guel 16:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:Protection
Sorry deskana! I didn't see the users, but rather the users who vandalized. I'll unprotect. <font color="Green">«  A NIMUM  <font color="Green">»  20:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Salman Rushdie
Thanks for protecting the article! It was getting out of hand. Predictable, really, given the knighthood. WP ought to be clever enough to pre-emptively semi-protect controversial characters when they suddenly get in the news again. BrainyBabe 17:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

SanchiTachi
Surely the first stage would be for him to inform you who those five other admins are, so they can join the discussion? --Fredrick day 18:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I don't know about "other admins" - since I'm not an admin - but I told him that if he wanted I would request that his talk page be unblocked so that he could appeal his blocking. I guess this is that request, but judging from your contact with him, I don't think it's going to be successful.  --Haemo 21:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Add in the fact he's got at least 5 confirmed sockpuppets, and 1 or 2 more suspected ones, and I doubt he's really ready to come back. Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 21:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I told him I'd forward his appeal directly to the arbitration committee for them to handle, and since that he's not mentioned the unblock. I told him again, but I only sent the e-mail two seconds ago. I'm not unblocking. --Deskana (talk) 21:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Salman Rushdie
In a recent edit Scottshen removed the protection template from the article Salman Rushdie. I've already got 5 reverts (4 for blatant vandalism, 1 for possibly debatable) on that article in the past 24 hours, so I don't want to risk another one. (Am I being overly cautious?) Best -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  18:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind: BorgQueen restored it.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  19:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

MightyKombat and his edit summaries
Maybe I'm making a bigger deal out of this than I have to, but do you think you could talk to MightyKombat about his edit summaries and his, what I see as, incivilty? He doesn't seem to what to cooperate with me, despite me talking to him about it more than once. // Decaimiento  Poético  18:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You've done the right things so far, and in telling me about this. I'll keep my eye on it, too. Thanks. --Deskana (talk) 19:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I assume I can't say this on the project page, so...
Acknowledged. Nothing further from me on that page. Bladestorm 21:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I just thought... my (incorrect) notice is still there. And, um, in caps. And, uh, in bold. It really stands out. Since he didn't do what I said he did, is it okay if I strike out that declaration? (Or, can you?) Bladestorm 21:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That is an extremely good idea. You doing it is an even better idea :-) --Deskana (talk) 21:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind me being too lazy to create another section. I don't think the archive-template-tag-doohickey-thingy took. (real technical, eh?) Bladestorm 23:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd never used those templates before. I took a total guess as to what they were called, and was almost correct, but they have spaces instead of hyphens. Got the hard stuff right and the easy stuff wrong. --Deskana (talk) 23:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Templates can have spaces? heh. didn't know that. Bladestorm 23:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protection of List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy
Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU!!!!!! -- <font color="#087180">Elaich  <font color="#7C1034">talk 02:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * :-P --Deskana (talk) 02:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Response.
The discussion should be closed by an outside observer. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Ooookay...
So now he's removed the archive template, and re-opened an argument that should've died a long time ago. He's still misattributing false statements to me, but I sooo don't want to confront him. At the same time, I don't want to escalate to AN/I just because he's stubborn, uncivil, and misrepresenting me. So, what do I do? It's so tempting to correct him (for example, my personal preference is that I actually like Goku as a simple name; it just doesn't seem appropriate for an article. And I like at least a few seasons of the dub, because they were done by the Ocean group, my favourite group of voice actors), but I can't see this ending if I do. And yet, it still didn't even end when it was archived. argh! what do I do? Bladestorm 23:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yargh! When am I going to learn?!? You're fast! I need to stop being so bloody hasty and calm down. Sorry for the spamming. :) Bladestorm 23:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speak to me as much as you like about whatever you want. That's what this page is for. I think the reason I'm so fast is because I've been around a while... I know what to do pretty much straight away, I don't have to spend ages thinking about it. Anyway, it looks like he's dropped it, which is good. Please don't continue this discussion on talk pages or anything. It is over. --Deskana (talk) 23:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sooo not a problem.
 * But you should probably think twice before suggesting that I talk about whatever I want...
 * I mean, have you seen the adorable little chipmunks in Bishonen's talk page? They're so freaking cute!
 * (toldja) Bladestorm 23:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to let you both know, I did another revert because he went in and removed comments by Bladestorm ("libelous claims" in the edit summary). Beyond that I promise to drop this myself. I know where Bladestorm's coming from with wanting to correct him, too. For all his claims of bias, I've actually watched the entire dub. Just watched that ep where Kuririn fought stage 1 Cell that was on this past Saturday. And I simply say "Goku" pretty much 99% of the time, so my opinion here is not based on bias. But I think all any of us on all sides were doing was fueling the flame, so it's best just to back away. Onikage725 00:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * grrr... he's still removing my comment, and labelling it "libelous". I very much don't want to take this to AN/I. I'm just sick and tired of fighting altogether. But I can't sit back and allow him to make legal accusations like 'libel' against me entirely uncontested. You're remarkably level-headed and calming. Can you have a word with him? Bladestorm 00:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Why is my comment bad, but your comment good? - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Deskana, I actually feel bad for you; in that you have to deal with so much headache that was of our creation, not yours. Hopefully, he'll stop eventually (or at least possibly notice that I only chastised him for his comment; and never once presumed to remove it). On a brighter note, didja look at the chipmunks? (Sooo cute!) Bladestorm 00:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey... you're still here! Go look at chipmunks. :)
 * Or go look up "Sons of Butcher" on youtube. They funny. :D
 * (or just ignore me) :) Bladestorm 01:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Busy here, I'm afraid. --Deskana (talk) 01:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

How do you keep your sanity? I'm actually kinda scared. You're generally a fairly calming influence on these kinds of things, even when you have to get firm. I've never seen you "yell." Onikage725 02:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't edit when I'm really pissed off with Wikipedia. That's why there's gaps of a few days when I don't edit. I quite frequently get pissed at Wikipedia due to having my arms bound by policy or some such. Be assured, I am human and I say stupid things, I just normally have the good sense to fix it. I'm not sure I've ever yelled, actually. --Deskana (talk) 02:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha. C'mon, I could totally hear the unspoken cursing behind "POST AN UNBLOCK REQUEST." Onikage725 02:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I was annoyed, yes. I don't like it when people ignore what I say. So I make it BIG and bold. That way they can't say they missed it :-p --Deskana (talk) 02:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for clearing that range block, hopefully blocking admin will be more careful in the future.--Crossmr 00:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning
I'll keep that in mind. I'm really just being sarcastic though. Hypocrisy bugs me, and I was hoping he'd back off this ranting about Bladestorm if I pointed out that he just did the same thing all of like 15 minutes ago. I was clearly mistaken in that hope though. Ah well. Onikage725 00:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Recoome
I did a little in-depth research to see what he was up to after I happened to have read Speed Air Man's edits. Did you see this recently? Lord Sesshomaru
 * What I thought was strange was that nobody had responded to Speed Air Man there, far as I read. Recoome's refusal to answer back to me at Dragonball wiki leads me to think that he was responsible for some past vandalism there. Recoome hasn't changed, what with the personal attacks and all. Now he is editing the List of Dragon Ball dubbed episodes page regularly. I've given serious thought of reverting everything his ips have edited on Wikipedia, reason being that he is a banned sockpuppet. Ideas? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Why are people reverting addition of wikilinks? That's not a crime. --Deskana (talk) 02:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Aside from the edit summary, I can't see what's wrong with this edit. By the way, I blocked the sock IP for 24 hours and Power Level was blocked indef. --Deskana (talk) 02:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Apparently, TTN attempted to redirect the episodes per WP:EPISODE guideline and from that point on, there was a little "edit war" between the Recoome ips, TTN, Power Level and Speed Air Man. As I am not sure if this will help, should I tag the ips as obvious socks of Recoome's or should I let them troll? Lord Sesshomaru
 * No point tagging them, he seems to hop IPs. I'll block them as I see them. --Deskana (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * A few days ago, I attempted to propose a new policy to be created in spite of the majority of anon. ips that edit the English Wikipedia. My proposal was rejected. Just out of curiosity, how do you feel about the anon. ips? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Anonymous IP editing is a fundamental principle of the project. I think it should be allowed. Actually, out of principle, I refuse to protect userpages simply because of user request. "Anyone can edit the enyclopedia, but I don't trust anonymous users to edit a page about me". What does that say? Even if they can't be trusted a lot of the time. Vandals will just register to vandalise, and we'll scare off the people that actually do use IPs. And another thing. Whenever Wikipedia is described in the press, it's always described as the encyclopedia anyone can edit. That's ALWAYS mentioned. --Deskana (talk) 03:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Very true. However, do you believe that there might come a time that people will be required to register to edit the encyclopedias? The ips on this Wikipedia are the only ones that can not create a page, as of December 2005. Lord Sesshomaru
 * I would say fully protect the pages from being reverted by Recoome's ips again. Why edit war with a sock over it? Would you do it kindly, or should I just request page protection? Lord Sesshomaru

A protection request would be denied. It's not been edited by anyone but us for a week. --Deskana (talk) 23:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * After some reading and further familiarity with WP:SOCK, did I do these things correctly? Lord Sesshomaru
 * I'll just continue reverting until page protection seems like the best choice here. Simply this is unacceptable, now you know why I'm against anonymous editing. Lord Sesshomaru
 * That tagging is correct, yes. --Deskana (talk) 20:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've had enough of all this. I'm going to request semi-protection, if that doesn't work, I don't know what will. Lord Sesshomaru
 * It has been reported. Let's hope for the best. Lord Sesshomaru

Re:The purpose of Wikipedia
I understand your view on this, but I have not been here long. Although I first started a membership here earlier this year, I wasn't able to actually do anything or contribute for a very long while because of different reasons, so my edits in those past months are very minimal. I have only just started to actually understand the inner workings of Wikipedia & I asked for adoption here for a reason: to be able to learn how to edit/add to wikipedia without messing it up or accidentally vandalizing. I would appreciate some time to be able to learn how to successfully contribute to wikipedia before any drastic steps are taken. <font color="black" face="zapfino">Polar <font color="lime" face="zapfino">wolf 16:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the constructive criticism & for not automatically blocking me. I'll try to become a more frequent editor. However, I'm not quite sure where to find articles to help fix up. Any ideas? <font color="black" face="zapfino">Polar <font color="lime" face="zapfino">wolf 20:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info <font color="black" face="zapfino">Polar <font color="lime" face="zapfino">wolf 20:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

User page Conflict
Hi, Deskana. I have a problem. One time I checked my new messges. It appeared that Picaroon was threatening me by saying a last warning when it should be my first. He was not civil. What do I do? I seem confuse with civil page, Louis Alberto Guel 00:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC).
 * Your response to Picaroon was unacceptable. It's not surprising he got a bit mad. --Deskana (talk) 13:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Your "Great unanswered Queston"
My answer: So that they don't have to see "User is blocked" big and bold when they click "edit this page" :). (And a surprise for you at my userpage). Cheers, mate! -- Susanna   Ban a  na  @ 03:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Course appreciated :-). It's just hard sometimes... vandals do not make it any easier :). You're just a "randomly awesome user". Cheers, mate!-- Susanna   Ban a  na  @ 20:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: User:Hornetman16
Officially yes, but I think the specifics of the GFDL would be completely lost on him anyway. In all honesty, I doubt he's around much longer before the community tires and places him on an indefblock, but that's just my candid opinion. If that ends up being the case, we can delete the page forever. I mainly restored it just to make the kid happy. I almost feel bad for him. ^ demon [omg plz] <em style="font-size:10px;">19:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Hornetman16
Thanks for that, I left autoblock unchecked because I was unsure if RoadRunner IPs were shared and didn't want to risk collateral damage. --Core<font color="#006449">desat 20:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Names of Famous people vs. stage names.
Excuse me Deskana,, but If their is a famous person who uses a stage name,,,,,,, should the Wikipedia article refer to him/her by the stage name or real name in the article's text. For example Boris Karloff's real name was William Henry Pratt, should the article's text(not the name of the article) refer to him as Pratt or Karloff(assuming that the articless refer by last names in the text). -- The Serene Silver Star 21:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Page delete
Can you delete page Template:User NFL-Raiders? I realized another page was similar to this. Also delete User:Louis Alberto Guel/NFL-Raiders. Thanks. Louis Alberto Guel 01:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure. Done it. --Deskana (talk) 01:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, can you delete Template:User Football, Template:User born in California, Template:User American football, Template:User: Born In California, Template:User Born In California, Template:User Born California, Category:Wikipedians Born in California, Category:Wikipedians who likes the Oakland Raiders, and Category:Wikipedians who likes, plays, or watches American football? I created the same thing over and over again because of some improper names and non working ones. And I also read about userboxes migration. --Louis Alberto Guel 14:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Whoa, whoa, whoa.
There was no speedy deletion warranted in that at all. There wasn't even anyone calling for speedy deletion. Do you have any idea how many lists would be speedily deleted under your logic? - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Tell me so I can delete them then. A GFDL violation means the article must be deleted, as ALL content on Wikipedia must be available under the GFDL. The violation is fixable in some cases, if you can history merge, but sometimes history merges don't work, if the two articles are too different; in such a case they must be deleted. --Deskana (talk) 02:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * There would be a big shit storm if an admin went around deleting lists because they contained content copied and pasted through merges. GFDL violation = copy/paste from ANOTHER web page. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Incorrect. GFDL requires attribution of the authors that created the page. Copy paste moves do not attribute, and therefore are GFDL violations. Read How to fix cut and paste moves if you won't believe me. I do know what I'm doing. --Deskana (talk) 02:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * So since you know what you're doing, how do we move the history? How can we just choose that Seviper's history is more important than Zangoose's, or vice versa? This is the only way to merge the text. Are you telling me that in the case of a large scale merge, that we should move the history of one article to that list? Basically, if what you say is true, merging is utterly impossible. I think you're just pushing your interpretation of the rules more than what actually is.
 * This is insane. If it was so bad to merge content released into the public domain, I'd venture that a LOT of people on Wikipedia have been very bad. WP:DB has been bad, WP:POKE has been bad, WP:FILM has been bad, WP:CVG has been bad. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite sure what you mean about "content released into the public domain". All content on Wikipedia is available under GFDL.
 * And about history merging... I'm about to perform a history merge now. You can see the results once I'm done. I'm hoping it'll work. If not, we'll have to undo some of the most recent edits, but it won't take much work to get it looking the way it was before. --Deskana (talk) 02:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Last time I checked, merging was fine. As long as the information of the original articles is still in the redirects, it should be good to go. Otherwise, as Link mentioned, people are messing things up pretty badly. I must be especially bad after merging 50-60 non-notable character articles to a list. TTN 02:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It's fine so long as somewhere in the page history, the original author is attributed. If you have an edit summary like...
 * "Merging content from A, B and C"
 * Then redirect A, B and C, and the original history is available, then the authors are properly attributed. Otherwise, it's a GFDL violation. --Deskana (talk) 02:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * For example, check out Abra evolutionary line now. All the page history of Abra (Pokémon), Kadabra and Alakazam is in there. It's a bit messed up, for example this, but it is GFDL compliant. It's a LOT easier to do when the target page and old page are similar, though. --Deskana (talk) 02:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

By the way, should a consensus emerge for the articles to be split again, it is possible to unmerge the histories. It'd probably take about half an hour though. So, if people are adamant it should be unmerged, please contact me so I can do it, since I know what I did in the first place. --Deskana (talk) 02:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That is probably how it should be done, but nobody actually does that way. Unless you want to propose some kind of definite "do a history merge after every single merge" policy, I wouldn't bother trying to enforce it or delete articles because of it. Again, nobody has ever even suggested doing it that way (WP:MERGE just says to leave them as redirects), and it leaves a very bad mess. TTN 17:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a history merge isn't appropriate in cases such as this; I was expecting the software to make more sense of the diffs than it did. However, if the articles are left as redirects, the redirects must be mentioned somewhere in the page history. Without attribution, they are violations of GFDL. All it needs is a note saying "articles copied from A, B and C". --Deskana (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Request
A user seems to be following me around in addition to somewhat "vandalizing" articles, switching content to be US-biased, and flaming (see here). He also seems to use multiple accounts:


 * 
 * 
 * 

And has deceptive edit summaries for another - claimed that a link didn't show a particular piece of information, when it clearly did. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If you suspect they're the same person, a Checkuser may be in order. I'd be happy to block if the outcome is that they're the same person. --Deskana (talk) 18:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Mystery of the Druids
I was not vandalizing the talk page, people from 4chan kept changing my comment so I had to continue reverting it.
 * Well, then I solved the problem didn't I? You don't have to revert it anymore since it's not there. --Deskana (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Daxter
It needs to be a certain % of what SHOULD be before it's not a stub. If the United States article was this long, would you call it a Start? - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That's your definiton of a stub. Mine is taken from WP:STUB. Yours is from...? --Deskana (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I asked - if the US article was only five paragraphs, would it be a stub? Stub implies a significant amount of missing content. And as it stands with Daxter, if you remove the unnecessary lists, it's only two paragraphs, and is missing much more. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it needs expanding. No, it's not a stub. If the US article was only five paragraphs it would not be a stub. It would just need expanding. There's a difference. --Deskana (talk) 01:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Peruse WP:RFE if you don't believe me. But you need to start trusting what I say rather than doubting everything I say, otherwise I can't help you with much. I don't like spending all my time on Wikipedia arguing. --Deskana (talk) 01:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

18:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)~ ʇuǝɯɯoɔɐqǝɟ-- ¿ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ǝɹoɟǝq „(ʞƮɐʇ)„ sʇnd ʞɔǝɥ ǝɥʇ uı oɥʍ ʇnq ‘ǝqʎɐƜ

Hey
Sorry bout that WP:UAA Report I thought it was a vio. Cheers.  MAJ5  (talk) (contribs) 14:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Could you delete my user page?
Unfortunatly someone purposely created it by tagging me.
 * Not until I investigate this further. If you really are a sockpuppet, you've put your foot in it by getting an admin involved. If you're not, then you've got nothing to worry about. :-) --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 19:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

A portal for Dragon Ball
I have made a Dragon Ball portal & contacted several users for assistance and no one has responded as of yet. Can you help me adhere the boxes correctly? At times, it appears fixed and all, then goes all wrong. I just can't seem to order the alignment of the boxes and sections. Lord Sesshomaru
 * What is the problem, specifically? The only thing I notice at the minute are the redlinked transclusions (something you're presumably aware of) and those peculiar lines over the boxes. If you click below them, you seem to get the image. Since I remember someone saying that  works by virtue of a CSS hack, if you're using other CSS as well over the top of them, that might be the cause of the lines. I think I can fix that. What else is wrong? --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 19:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Interesting. The blue lines don't show up when I use IE7, but do when I use Firefox. Oh well. I don't think I can fix that. What else is wrong? --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 19:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) - What boxes would look better to the left and what boxes would be better off into the right? If you hit the preview button, everything looks organized; when you view the page normally its a mess. I can take care of those red links, I just need someone to keep the page looking fixed, like Portal:Naruto. See how the Naruto one appears? I'm aiming to have it as correct and organized like that. Lord Sesshomaru
 * It is like the Naruto one on my screen. It all lines up nicely. What resolution/browser/OS are you using? --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 19:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I tried to purge the page to look like the Naruto one, didn't work. I think my resolution is 1200 by something, I'm using Windows XP if that's what you mean. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Are you using Internet Explorer? Is your resolution 1280x1024? --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 19:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I don't know the number, but yes it is Internet Explorer 6, not 7. Lord Sesshomaru
 * I don't have IE6 anymore, so I can't attempt to help with the problem. But on both IE7 and Firefox, at my resolution of 1280x1024, its layed out perfectly. --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 19:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Guess I'll have to deal with it later when I return. There's something that this portal doesn't have that the Naruto one has, what could it be? Oh, can you kindly put back the Selected picture red link? I do plan on making the selected picture the Toriyama bot, which is not a fair use pic. Lord Sesshomaru

What do you suggest? How should I go about it if you revert everything? Remove what really is unecessary there. Also, what language is your signature in since it looks like little squares to me? Lord Sesshomaru
 * I'm not sure also what is to become of Portal:Dragon Ball/box-header-top and Portal:Dragon Ball/box-header-middle, this is all still bewildering, this portal creation. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Sorry to be off topic for now, what do you think of this messy image: Image:Inuprofile.png? Lord Sesshomaru
 * This all must have slipped your mind? A little help? Lord Sesshomaru
 * I'd leave the header and middle alone. I've never tried portal creation before. --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 02:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case you deleted
I hit the wrong button on TWINKLE, I was about to request speedy deletion on it anyways, so thanks for taking care of it! <font face="Trebuchet MS">Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 02:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

OMG COI

 * :-) Viridae Talk 02:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * :-) --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 02:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Does that mean you accepted? Congrats! Flyguy649talkcontribs 02:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

*sigh*
... is all. Thanks for staying cool - A l is o n  ☺ 03:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Question
Do you have to be so hostile withe the blocks?--   Hornetman16   03:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I am not hostile. Perhaps you should try not getting into edit wars and listening to other people rather than insisting you're right all the time. You'd get a lot less threats of blocks that way. --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 03:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You guys aren't always right either!--   Hornetman16   04:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Although Deskana's more likely to be right than you are. You haven't showed a great amount of good judgement during the last, well, ever.  Daniel  06:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I was talking to him not you, Daniel.--   Hornetman16   06:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The beauty of Wikipedia is that anyone can edit.  Daniel  06:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I welcome users wishing to respond to threads on my talkpage, especially when I'm offline. --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 16:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Thing is i want your opinion not Daniels!!!!--   Hornetman16   20:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * And here I go asking you to chill out. Calm down, please. You came within about 2 minutes of being blocked yesterday. So just don't start the day here with another argument - A l is o n  ☺ 20:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

All I said was I wanted Deskana's answer not Daniels. I'm not trying to be hotheaded.--   Hornetman16   22:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Then!!! you!!! need!!! to use!!! less!!! punctuation!!!! - A l is o n  ☺ 22:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed!!! --ɐuɐʞsəp (ʞɿɐʇ) 23:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * :D sorry :D --   Hornetman16   23:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)