User talk:Desmay

Have been here over a decade, mostly interested in religious and other topics.

Oxford/Grosvenor Square
Hi Desmay. I've cut the info you added on Grosvenor Square to the Oxford entry, as that is to do with Oxford Street, London, not the city of Oxford. I've pasted your text here so you can add it somewhere more appropriate if you wish. --hooverbag 08:58, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)
 * Oxford Street in London features on its south side the well-known Grosvenor Square, encompassing six acres and named for Sir Richard Grosvenor. The houses in the area are generally considered quite magnificent. It includes an equestrian statue of King George I.

Michael Moore edit
It was wrong to remove the reference to the family who were scandalized and appalled at their son's funeral being in Moore's movie without permission. This is very legitimate criticism of Moore and deserves mention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desmay (talk • contribs) 15:35, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I agree. However the edit also had serious POV problems.  There have been further attempts to present it in NPOV form and these should continue. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:31, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

AIDS Dissent Wikicity
Hi, Dean. (Yes, I know who you are.) You may be interested in contributing to the AIDS Dissent Wikicity I founded last month. Mostly, I'm the only contributor so far, but I'm looking for others to join in. There's about 25 articles started so far. I think dissidents do not really have a fair chance here at wikipedia, and also I think it's good to have a site where a strict NPOV policy can be slightly modified. Please, come and check it out: Revolver 03:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Redirect
Hi there: to make a redirect, type "#REDIRECTarticle, inserting the article name to which you want to redirect. Must be in capitals, spacing is critical.--Anthony.bradbury 17:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, the above message went to the wrong person.--Anthony.bradbury 17:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Robert A. Heinlein
Hi. I reverted this change. Heinlein's biographer, Bill Patterson, says:


 * Robert Anson Heinlein was born on 7 July 1907, in Butler, Bates County, Missouri, the third son of Rex Ivar Heinlein and Bam Lyle Heinlein. Heinlein had two older brothers -- Lawrence and Rex, Jr. He was succeeded by a sister -- Louise -- another brother -- Jesse -- and then two more sisters -- Rose Betty and Mary Jean, also called "MJ" -- seven children in all.

I'm not sure how to reconcile that with this page, as I'd also expect James Gifford's site to be reliable. I can speculate that Jay might be a nickname for Jesse, but that's just a random guess. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  20:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

October 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. MBK004 01:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Ms. Monster
Hi, Dean. I added to Ms. Monster because it doesn't establish that she meets our basic notability criteria. If you can improve the article, please do. If you have any questions, you can contact me on my talk page, check Questions, or leave and you question on this page, and someone will be around to help shortly. Cheers, WODU P  04:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Christmastide edit
Desmay: I saw your recent edit to the Christmastide article, and I did not revert it, but I would ask you to reconsider it, as the sentence you changed was not saying what you thought it did. The sentence was not saying that only "some" Christian churches recognized Christmas, it says that only some Christian churches recognize it as a 'liturgical season', which is quite different. Many evangelical, fundamentalist, or "low-church" denominations don't have a concept of 'liturgical season'. Sigil7 (talk) 22:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ms. Monster
I have nominated Ms. Monster, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ms. Monster. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. WODU P  03:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Double-Donkey Kong Junior (video game)
A tag has been placed on Double-Donkey Kong Junior (video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 14:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Resistance is futile
I removed what you had added to the article above; "It is unclear what if any relationship this phrase has to the older Science Fiction catch-phrase, "Resistance is useless!" as used by sources preceeding the introduction of the Borg in Star Trek (see Vogon and [The Dalek Invasion of Earth] for some examples)."

If it is unclear, then it shouldn't really be added to the article. To do so is making a bit of mild original research. Alastairward (talk) 10:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Desmay! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 12:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Bill Ham -
 * 2) Thom Doucette -

You are seriously retarded
As quoted from you on the discussion page for the Jimmy John's article.

A sentence here makes no sense to me: "After Liautaud realized it would cost nearly twice as much as the loan to start a hot dog business. Twice as much as what?" Dean Esmay (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Learn to stop reading sentences halfway through and you may not have to ask such ignorant ass questions, you fucking dipshit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.157.150.169 (talk • contribs) 10:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dariel Pertwee


The article Dariel Pertwee has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP of actor who lacks any clear claim of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exok (talk) 13:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

A Voice for Men I have currently started a proposed article for A Voice for Men, which I am Managing Editor of.

Your submission at AfC A Voice for Men was accepted
 A Voice for Men, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  T K  K ! bark with me! 00:08, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Men's rights movement sanctions notification
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages. ''The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is necessarily any problem with your edits. Thank you.'' -- Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your sig
You should put a space after the last of your writing (even if a period) and the ~ because what's happening is the D in Dean is coming right after a period and it looks ugly to not have a space between the punctuation and the sig. It should have a space like starting a new sentence. Ranze (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Ouch. I have been a Wikipedian for like 10 years and I still blow it on little things like this. Thanks for the tip! 19:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Virtual Center of Biotechnology for the Americas


The article Virtual Center of Biotechnology for the Americas has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. Tagged for notability since 2009. Orphan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~KvnG 21:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Esmay
Hello! You may not but might know me from the YouTube comment sections as the spaniel dressed and posed as a gardener. I was wondering if you'd like to try to get WP:MEN talking or working on some things. For example, there's a new MGTOW article in the works. Chrisrus (talk) 01:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi I am currently on something of a boycott of Wikipedia due to what I view as corruption. I'm willing to help out on specific projects if people are trying to overcome the entrenched powers on men's issues. Contact me via phone, skype, whatever, my contact info is at the top here.Dean Esmay (talk) 03:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi there I'm sorry for not getting back to you, I was on Wikipedia hiatus for many years. I'm back now and interested in other things but if you reach me on TWitter or Facebook under the Max Kolbe group name I'll get it. I can give pointers and advice although I'm not up for extended edit fights.

Nomination of Nathan Norman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Norman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathan Norman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Commenting on RfCs
Hi, regarding - the page is built by a bot which will remove or overwrite anything that it didn't put there itself, as it did with.

What you should do is follow the link at the top of the entry - in this case it's Wikipedia talk:Translation - which will take you to the RfC in the "Machine-translations" section. There you will see comments by others - just use the edit link adjacent to the section heading and add your comments at the bottom. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ThanksDean Esmay (talk)

Adam Banner
Since your vote to delete the page, I added my reasons why it should stay. As someone who appears to balanced, fair and impartial, curious to know your thoughts about what I wrote. Billsimmons7 (talk) 22:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Re: Deletion review/Log/2017 August 14
You seem to have posted the same text twice. bd2412 T 22:57, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it has been removed. bd2412  T 23:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Template removal
Do not remove (another contributor's) template until the issue has been resolved; the template's is open through several venues. Instructions about template removal are within the template itself. Thanks.  THE PROMENADER  ✎ ✓  09:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Flemish people, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:59, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, my apologies. You are correct, so I've restored your version. The Ipsos data and newspaper article both deal with Belgium, not Flemish people. Feel free to trout me! Keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, I try to be accurate as possible. Pax. desmay (talk) 19:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Ideological atheists triyng to whitewash mass shooter's beliefs
I need your help over at Sutherland Springs church shooting. People over their are performing mental gymnastics to try to conceal the shooter's beliefs.The New Classic (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I apologize for not getting back to you on Sutherland Springs, have been busy. Do you still need help there, I'm pretty swamped but I can try if needed. desmay (talk) 19:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:


 * https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.


 * Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Please review your vote
This is a BLP you can’t possibly have reviewed this article if this is your opinion of it. Spartaz Humbug! 08:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Sorry you didn't like it. desmay (talk) 00:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Ethnic article
After google search results I saw there is an article for Bashkardi language but not for Bashkardi people. Somehow strange. Is there any explanation for this error? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caddyspoked (talk • contribs) 23:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not answering sooner I'm bad at checking messages. Truth is I don't have time to start such an article but it sounds like a good idea.desmay (talk) 03:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Don't waste on my talk page. Use the article's talk page.
Try to gain consensus on the article's talk page. Don't ignore reliable sources. It's pretty basic stuff. Closeclouds (talk) 20:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

NewtonX, Inc. Afd
Hello, Desmay. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  scope_creep Talk  20:52, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I am aware of no such conflicts thank you.

General sanctions for Michael Jackson
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020 False Allegation, refuted, see below
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Hi, am. One among edit your just made in a user Code16 page seems to be disruptive, if this userpage belong to you, easily you can referred it as alternative account but not putting some tags that you didn't open a sock puppet file or discussions against it. ( F5PILLAR -- (Let's talk) 08:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC) '' ( F5PILLAR -- (Let's talk)  08:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * I have no alternative accounts and have used this account myself alone for more than a decade. Your allegation of Code 16 is false and an allegation made without a shred of evidence. Further, you have not really explained what evidence there is that I've even been "edit warring." Please be specific, where is your evidence that any of what you are saying has occurred or is occurring? desmay (talk) 12:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)`
 * Further: The tag placement on Code16's user page was just routine housekeeping. Note that the tag was already placed by a sysop on Code16's talk page . Do your research before making whimsical claims. desmay (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm interested why F5Pillar is so angry about the edit. Generally, editing people's userpages is frowned upon, but you were simply adding a sockpuppet tag to an account that was blocked over 5 years ago... How is the edit disruptive? — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 13:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
MrClog (talk) 02:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Elizium23 (talk) 18:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Question
On Armin Navabi, he recently got banned from Twitter. However, I am not able to find a source, except for his Facebook account which confirmed it via screen shot. Is that acceptable for us to use to update? Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 23:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Zakaria1978 to be honest I've never tried using a screen shot as a source so I don't know. desmay (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Growth of religion
I don't understand why you insist on repeating, the Chinese scenario was mentioned before, I do not understand the goal of repeating it again, is the goal is to create Illusory truth effect? so that the current study did not mention that it excluded China, but rather said that there is a lack of reliable data for all religious groups there, because China does not conduct national statistics for all followers of religions in it, not only for Christians. Nor does the source say that the reason for the growth of Christians there is conversion. Even that this study is based on unconfirmed and unreliable data, it is originally not worth repeating. ~ The good man 232 (talk) 10:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The growth of Christianity in China, despite persecution, is well documented. This persecution is a serious issue, and the growth is an important phenomenon. Otherwise, it might be better to discuss this on the discussion page.desmay (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Warning:Hounding
please stop harassment other users by hounding them in order to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. --The good man 232 (talk) 17:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Please provide evidence I have hounded anyone. Feel free to call me 313-334-4887 if you think there's been a misunderstanding.desmay (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:King David (1997 Animated Film)
Hello, Desmay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:King David (1997 Animated Film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:King David (1997 Animated Film)


Hello, Desmay. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "King David".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Signing in articles
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Akhand Bharat. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on talk pages or project pages such as the Teahouse. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sola gratia
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sola gratia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Desmay&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1176724633 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sola_gratia&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1176724633%7CSola%20gratia%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Tristan Tate. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''WP:BLP. Get consensus for inclusion before restoring contested content.'' VQuakr (talk) 23:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Tristan Tate, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 23:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey, I saw you mentioned you didn't plan to keep editing in the subject area, but I am a little curious if you don't mind; what made you decide to come in hot on this one and start restoring contested content to a BLP? We've both been around a while and it was a little jarring. If you don't want to discuss, that's fine of course. VQuakr (talk) 01:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The Tate brothers have been all over the news so I was surprised to see that the article about Tristan was nominated for deletion. desmay (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Christian nationalism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skyerise (talk) 20:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)