User talk:Detailedbeet123

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of national animals has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of national animals was changed by Detailedbeet123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888312 on 2020-11-01T08:17:59+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 10:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Shaw logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Shaw logo.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Trivago, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MB 19:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. An edit that you recently made to Japan seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Canterbury Tail talk 20:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Madagascar (2005 film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at All Hail King Julien, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Competence is required
I can't help but noticed that most of your edits have been reverted by multiple different people. Looking through your edits, in general they seem to range from not competent to outright disruptive. I will note that competence is required here on Wikipedia. Currently you are costing the project more time and effort that you are providing to it in competent edits. If you continue edits that are taking the valuable time of other editors to clean up, you will be blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. This is your one and only warning to improve your edits now, or be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 23:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shaw Wallace. Materialscientist (talk) 11:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

You have been blocked for continued addition of unsourced material, and your continued editing behaviour that does not bring value to the project. Practically every edit you make has been reverted, and as mentioned before competence is required. If after your block expires and you return to editing, you do not improve the quality of your edits, I'm afraid that in order to preserve the integrity of the project, and to save other editors time from having to continually revert your edits, you will be blocked indefinitely. Canterbury Tail talk 15:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.