User talk:Detnchris14

I Conseve your stuff.

Speedy deletion nomination of Final Destination 3.1
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Final Destination 3.1, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung (talk) 14:21, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Final Destination 3.1 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Blue Rasberry  14:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BSA Troop 100


A tag has been placed on BSA Troop 100 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Bhockey10 (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Excirial. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Fred: The Movie with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:20, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Excirial. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Fred: The Movie with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Twilight (2008 film) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:50, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop making this edit at List of Pair of Kings episodes. It's completely unconventional and is not a good way to present the data. The previous format is a much better way to present the information. Consistently changing it without any discussion, even by way of edit summaries is disruptive and constitutes edit-warring. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 15:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Despite the polite request above, I see that you have again added your edits to the article without any attempt to discuss on the talk page as requested. Such editing is considered to be disruptive. Disruptive editing is inappropriate. Please stop and discuss your proposals before making them. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Please also note that this edit introduced incorrect capitalisation. Please review MOS:CAPS for guidance on how to capitalise. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

To Aussielegend, I only edited Pair of Kings as it was.

Talkback

 * Please ensure that you read that discussion before editing List of Pair of Kings episodes again. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)