User talk:DetroitMan191

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 21 Jump Street (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 21 Jump Street (film) was changed by DetroitMan191 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95262 on 2015-05-30T22:17:55+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 21 Jump Street (film) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dick in a Box, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dick in a Box was changed by DetroitMan191 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958867 on 2015-05-30T22:46:23+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Monty 845  23:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Where do I began about what I did wrong, I chose to vandalize Wikipedia and got banned indefinitely for it. I vandalized three pages and a talk page as well. I knew what I did is wrong, all I'm asking for is, is the fact that you give me a second chance. I was trying to be funny and instead caused damage/vandalism that showed my opinions on those articles I messed with. I didn't want to be banned, and I do love Wikipedia to death....
 * Can you give us an example of a specific constructive edit you would make if you are unblocked? Monty  845  23:32, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

The first constructive edit I will do is to the article on J.L. Hudson Department Store and Addition, as I read an article about the site's future and I felt like that should be put in, so those who read the article on Wikipedia, know about the site's future with Dan Gilbert. DetroitMan191 (talk) 23:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)DetroitMan191
 * Do you have a reliable source that you will use as a reference and that will support what you intend to include in the edit? Monty  845  23:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

I do in fact, have a source for that edit. DetroitMan191 (talk) 23:51, 30 May 2015 (UTC)DetroitMan191
 * Ok, I'll unblock you. I don't have a lot of faith, but blocks are cheap, and I'll Assume Good Faith and give you another chance. Just don't expect any more if you resume vandalizing. Monty  845  00:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Monty.I won't let you downDetroitMan191 (talk) 00:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)DetroitMan191

September 2023
I recently regained access to this account after 8 years. I've spent a lot of time reflecting on my choices, and not only have I turned over a new leaf completely, I've matured a lot.

When I created this account, I was an edgy middle schooler who wanted to show his friends that he vandalized Wikipedia for fun. I'm now a mature young woman in college, who has decided it is better to start over new. As such... I'm no longer using this account, and now use Wikipedia as Saberclaw84.

To the admin who gave me a second chance... thank you. DetroitMan191 (talk) 05:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)