User talk:Deuleu

Image copyright problem with Image:Esatpasha.png
Thank you for uploading Image:Esatpasha.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Islamic Emirate of Albania
Do you have any sources for such an article, I can find no evidence that such a state ever existed. --Fredrick day 22:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes. Sources are in Albanian textbooks, such as 'Anes Lumejve' Skender Jasa etc.. Look here as well and help me to put the flags of the emirate online. http://www.geocities.com/olsi.rm/Pergjigja.htm

Can u help?

I'm afraid I don't speak that language but I will get wikipedia editors who do to check it over. --Fredrick day 22:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Do you have experts on Albania? Many Albanians like to hide the history of the Islamic Emirate. If you can upload in this page the picture of the main commander of the Islamic Revolution: Haji Qamil: http://www.geocities.com/olsi.rm/Pergjigja_files/image005.jpg


 * I was unable to find any reference to Haxhi Qamili and an "Islamic Emirate of Albania". It seems that he and the Mufti of Tirana were leaders of the "Union of Krujë". Please comment at Talk:Islamic Emirate of Albania. Thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

No. Do not put it Union of Kruje. Let him how I put it. He was the fieldcommander of the Islamic Emirate of Albania 1914 - 1915. Union of Kruja was one of the many 'besa' - oaths that Albanian Muslims undertook to remain loyal to the Ottomans.

Can you provide any english language sources that make reference to it as the Islamic Emirate of Albania ? --Fredrick day 23:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

No. Only my Phd thesis will be the only coming source as far I know. Our communist historiography was too much ashamed to accept this fact. In English I am not much aware. There are some mentionings in books on history of Albania - but superficially as far as I am aware.

I'm afraid we have a problem then - your PhD thesis is what we call Original research WP:OR and is not an acceptable basis for an article. Oh and please sign your posts with --~ --Fredrick day 23:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Most of the articles in Wikipedia are coming from sources that are not authoritative. I see on the section on Albania, you have so many errors and mistakes. However on the Islamic Emirate you have even online published articles and its references should be enough for you as well - http://www.geocities.com/olsi.rm/Pergjigja.htm. are they not?

Please sign your posts as instructed. I cannot read that language and I'm not sure how it helps with an english language source that supports this claim? Above you have already suggested you came up with this name - is this not correct? --Fredrick day 23:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

What did I suggest above? Sorry! I do not understand very well how you use this system. The Islamic Emirate is part of Albania's history. If it is scary, than do as you choose. Important is that you guys offer an open enciclopedia for everything. Good night for today.

Copyright infringement
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Principality of Albania - Durres, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, Principality of Albania - Durres appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Principality of Albania - Durres has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Principality of Albania - Durres and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Principality of Albania - Durres with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Principality of Albania - Durres.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.  Mel sa  ran  22:40, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Haxhiqamil.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Haxhiqamil.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Haxhiqamil.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Haxhiqamil.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ethembey.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ethembey.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Ethembey.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Ethembey.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 01:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Varferi.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Varferi.jpg. The copy called Image:Varferi.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Bajram1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Bajram1.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

sign your posts
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Fredrick day 15:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Please sign as indicated above - the current way you are doing it - it does not provide a timestamp. --Fredrick day 21:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion
See Articles for deletion/Islamic Emirate of Albania. --Core desat 22:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Varferi.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Varferi.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 16:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)