User talk:Deus15

Welcome!


Hello, Deus15, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing! Sam Sailor 15:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard is warmly recommended)
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Ask questions at Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Are you ready for editing?
 The Adventure

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Norwich into Norwich Lanes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norwich Blitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Norwich_Blitz check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Norwich_Blitz?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ber Street, Norwich
Thanks for creating Ber Street, Norwich.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

"Good work, but there's several claims that don't have citations attached, particularly in the History section"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 20:28, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Heigham (Norwich) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Heigham (Norwich), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~GMC {talk to me} 18:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Heigham (Norwich) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Heigham (Norwich), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Heigham (Norwich)


Hello, Deus15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heigham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi Deus15, thanks for your recent edits over at Norwich. I'd just like to remind you about the importance of using edit summaries in your edits - in particular because it would make it easier for other editors to understand the rationale behind your changes (one example being the slightly puzzling removal of the pushpin map from the infobox on the Norwich page). Cheers — Jumbo T (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edna Cintron


The article Edna Cintron has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tragic, but not notable. Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:08, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Edna Cintron for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edna Cintron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edna Cintron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Edna Cintron.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Edna Cintron.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of pubs in Norwich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of pubs in Norwich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of pubs in Norwich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SilkTork (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)