User talk:Deus et lex/Archive 1

Thankyou for making logic of ytoyoda! I feel he is on a mission to get articles deleted just because he think he is right and he goes out of his way to do this! I feel this is a abuse of his powers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.208.222 (talk) 03:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome
G'day Deus et lex, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email [mailto:help@wikimedia.org.au?subject=Help+me+please!&body=Please+tell+us+your+Wikipedia+username+and+the+article+you+are+trying+to+change+and+what+the+problem+is help@wikimedia.org.au].

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Where to ask a question, try the Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:


 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Article titles
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 01:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Carol Wagner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carol Wagner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carol Wagner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Goulburn Valley Football Association
Hi,

I am really disappointed with what you have done to months of research work I have put into the both the GVFA and GVSEFA sites, compiling months of valuable grand final history from 1888 to 1930 and you go and delete it because you think it's not ''newsworthy". This really is a despicable act to do without discussing with me how to improve the site. How on earth has this improved the site ?

Your have also deleted the site - Goulburn Valley Second Eighteens Football Association in the process. There was heaps of valuable history citations and links to back up each and every entry.

Why would you do such a thing ?

I am really disappointed with your actions.

I am a local in the North East / Goulburn Valley Victoria region and have got very positive feedback from the initial history information I loaded and you go and delete it. I think my research standards are way better than yours and would appreciate your response why you took such actions.

Thanks,

Justin Kelly.

Dr
Hello! As per the Manual of Style, we don't add "Dr" to infoboxes. Instead, the appropriate qualifications are listed in the main body of the article. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 21:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, don't add Dr to infoboxes. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 23:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Seeking your Advice
I wonder whether you have an opinion about this article: Alistair Macdonald-Radcliff Is the subject notable? The article has been nominated for deletion. With best wishes, Tillander  20:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cindy Dock


A tag has been placed on Cindy Dock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Cindy Dock. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

"Cindy Dock" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cindy Dock. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nightfury 11:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC
Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Pro Wrestling Australia
I was about to add this to the AfD but Black kite got in first and sent it back to draft, which was ultimately correct as long as the move block that Wang Wahine said was possible is done. So I will say it here on your talk page. "biggest show that's happened in Australia" (in the headline) "Australia's top professional wrestlers" "biggest locally produced event in Australian wrestling history" (from a quote) in the first two paragraphs clearly contradicts your claim. In fact it barely talks about the promotion outside of the event. It focuses on comments by one notable wrestler who is clearly in promotional mode (Robbie Eagles) and one non notable wrestler (Jack Bonza). And where is the review of the show by the Sydney Morning Herald? If it was so big they would have covered it off their own bat. And they didn't. Ask yourself why. I can only think of one explanation. The article was promotional for the event. Addicted4517 (talk) 01:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)