User talk:Dev.giant17

Dev.giant17, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Clothing technology.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Fashion design. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 13:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Advice

 * You are very lucky that Favonian blocked you for only 24 hours. If you continue in the way you have been going, you are likely to be blocked for much longer, perhaps even indefinitely. In order to help you avoid that happening, here are a few points about what kind of thing is acceptable.


 * 1) Articles must be written from a neutral point of view. Your editing consists largely of posting content intended to promote the Indian textile industry, much of it expressed in glowing terms. You may think that something is "beautiful" and "stylish", that it "adds elegance", or that somewhere is "a hub of renowned designers" with a "rich traditional heritage", but those are opinions, not objective facts, and they should not be in a Wikipedia article.
 * 2) Article content needs references to reliable sources so that it is verifiable. Otherwise we have no way of knowing that it hasn't been made up by the editors who posted it. Much of what you have written shows every sign of being merely your own opinions.
 * 3) If you are going to continue to edit an English language encyclopaedia then you need to be careful about how punctuation works in English. For example, one would write "for global as well as domestic startups, new businesses, industry and brands." not "for global as well as domestic startups, new businesses , industry and brands ."
 * Please do take note of these comments. They are important. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 14:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)