User talk:Dev buznik

Rathnam and Shan Ratnam
You created an article named Rathnam.Please be adviced that Shan Ratnam describes the same person and do so in a much better way.I cannot figure out what was the necessity to create another article on the same person, while a much better discourse on the person concerned exists in Shan Ratnam !! PLease try to merge the article to Shan Ratnam.Oterwise, you can put a redirect to your created article and redirect it to Shan Ratnam.Thank you.--Dwaipayanc 14:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!--Dwaipayanc 14:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Eliyathamby
Hello, thanks for creating the article about Eliyathamby. At the moment the article is not properly formatted and needs some rewriting and cleaning up to reach an encyclopedic standard of quality. I've left a note for you and any other editors who read or edit the article at Talk:Eliyathamby with some suggestions for improvement. Please do not delete the tags until the article has been cleaned up. Don't let this discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia! It's a good and interesting article, it just needs some work. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, and for general Wikipedia guidelines, see the links on the Welcome message above. Regards, Canley 14:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

eliyathamby
this is in reference to the advice provided bycanley on the article, firstly i would want to state that this article is true and is part of a research project that i am conducting as i am piecing the pieces together. i request all of the previous items to be placed back as they are all true. i do understand that all of this required clear evidence and statements. this being a thing of the past it is rather difficult as singapore generally does not publish data that is freely available.

-firstly eliya thamby had great influence and had the ability to squash up important matters, thus my goal is to dicover what really went on thus i am doing so secondly from a source it was said that he was a medical doctor and was qualified for the task, but chose not to do so. as that was not what he wanted to do, it was said to be because it was his dad's ambition and so on, it was also partly related to status. the very fact he went on to being a gynaecologist was due to the fact that his father was around for a while ensuring his sons future.

-secondly the only thing that i was able to find out about him easily was his cars as this was what he was known for.

-great eastern assurance had been founded by another induvidual who went into monetary troubles as time went on, thus it has been said that eliyathamby took on the task of establishing the company it was said that initialy said that he was the silent investor and later went mainstream.

these are the bits and pieces that i am piecing together to try and uncover the mystery of mr. eliyathamby

thus i request for the item not be removed but i shall ensure that it is improved but over the course of time


 * Eliyathamby has been deleted as a recreation of an article which was deleted due to consensus at Articles for deletion/Eliyathamby. The reason for deletion was that the article was judged to be a hoax - if you have reliable, verifiable sources for the article, I suggest you raise the matter at Deletion review, and provide your sources there. --Stormie 13:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)