User talk:Devak31 naru

Welcome
Hello, Devak31 naru, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

February 2014
Hello, I'm Chanderforyou. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person   on Ekta Kaul, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. :- Chander  For  You'''  13:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rj Preet


A tag has been placed on Rj Preet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Widr (talk) 14:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Rj Preet, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Widr (talk) 14:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Widr with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 14:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Rj Preet. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 14:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Rj Preet. K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 14:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

RJ Preet
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: RJ Preet. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RJ Preet
Hello, Devak31 naru. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, RJ Preet, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want RJ Preet to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of RJ Preet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RJ Preet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/RJ Preet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to RJ Preet, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to RJ Preet. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 17:05, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at RJ Preet, you may be blocked from editing. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 17:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at RJ Preet. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 17:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to RJ Preet. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Disruptive editing. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RJ Preet


A tag has been placed on RJ Preet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ASCII-002 I Notify Online  11:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at RJ Preet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. As you know, this page was properly deleted at Articles for deletion/RJ Preet. Dougweller (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I've protected the title from creation, given your past disruptive edits during the time the article was at AFD and your re-creation. If the subject ever meets the notability guidelines you can request that the protection be removed by an administrator here. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RJ Preet Atwal


A tag has been placed on RJ Preet Atwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ASCII-002 I Notify Online  07:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:36, 22 May 2014 (UTC)