User talk:Devawn

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! &mdash;Dgiest c 17:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have removed your unsourced 'superfund' information from the Scottsdale, Arizona article. Please review WP:NOT for information on wikipedia's policies on what to include and what not to include in articles. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not anyone's personal soapbox or blog to advertise their own political views. Dr. Cash 04:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have reverted your additions of three paragraphs of unsourced 'superfund' information from the Scottsdale, Arizona article, and added a condensed version of this with an appropriate reference to the economy section. It is inappropriate for that information to appear at the beginning of the 'history' section in three paragraphs. I would suggest reading Wikipedia's Manual of Style, as well as the tutorial, to help you in editing Wikipedia. You might also want to review What Wikipedia is not as well, for guidelines on the neutral point of view policy. Dr. Cash 19:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

It is unconsciounable that you have removed the FACTS I stated and cited to the EPA regarding the NIBW. There were FIVE Scottsdale wells found to be highlly contaminated with TCE. Superfund is a noun, which should be capitalized, not a word I made up in quotations. The FACTS about the site should be restored to History, where they belong. How do I fix this outrageous edit of FACTS?