User talk:Devconfire

Notability of Pic vicious
A tag has been placed on Pic vicious requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You're free to contest this, but you should be made aware that bands and performers have to have an extremely high threshhold of notability to be included here. I don't want to see you wasting your time on what will surely be a speedy deletion.  Please read WP:BAND to learn more.  Thanks.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Don't remove speedy tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Pic vicious. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil 15:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's talk page.

Notability of Pic vicious...again
You're going to need to do much more to show with reliable sources how this person is notable. I'm not going to tag it for deletion right now (not that someone else won't), but I will likely take it to articles for deletion soon if it's not improved. --Onorem♠Dil 01:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pic vicious
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pic vicious, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Pic vicious. The tag isn't needed here because the article isn't tagged for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil 11:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The tag does not belong on the article. Please stop adding it. That tag is only used when an article is being considered for speedy deletion. This article isn't. --Onorem♠Dil 11:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop adding the hangon tag
I don't know how to make this any more clear. The tag is only used when an article has been tagged for SPEEDY DELETION. This article is NOT tagged for SPEEDY DELETION. The tag is completely useless in this case. Please stop adding it. If you'd like to discuss why the article should not be deleted, please do it at Articles for deletion/Pic vicious. --Onorem♠Dil 12:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Pic vicious
Please do not add the tag to an article that is not being marked for speedy deletion, as you have repeated done on Pic vicious. If you add the tag again, your edits may be seen as disruptive and you may be blocked. Do not add the tag again. Regards, Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 12:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hip hop music, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 12:56, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mfr logo small.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Mfr logo small.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)