User talk:Develofix

Image tagging for File:Kids in the House logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kids in the House logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Restoration page
Good workReginaldTQ (talk) 00:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Develofix (talk) 23:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Iceberg by Helidon Xhixha.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iceberg by Helidon Xhixha.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Bliss by Helidon Xhixza.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bliss by Helidon Xhixza.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

undisclosed paid editing
Hello Develofix. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Annalaura di Luggo, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Develofix. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Vexations (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know her, I'm going to see her show though. Can't find much information, but thought I'd try a page as it seems like thre is a lot of Italian stuff I've been able to read. Is there not enough? Develofix (talk) 03:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep trying to write about art but tend to fail... Develofix (talk) 03:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Annalaura di Luggo at AfD
Hi Develofix, the article you started, Annalaura di Luggo is listed at Articles for deletion/Annalaura di Luggo. An anonymous user has added so much text into the article that it's unfortunately very difficult for especially non-Italian speakers to understand what's important in the article and what's not. I didn't start the AfD but I thought maybe you'd want to know about it. -kyykaarme (talk) 23:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)