User talk:DevilboyScooby

Image copyright problem with Image:3768-v2-orig.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:3768-v2-orig.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Jak & Ratchet Playstation 3 Box Art.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:3768-v2-orig.jpg. The copy called Image:3768-v2-orig.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chandler CNK.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chandler CNK.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Annihilation Nation


The article Annihilation Nation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Absolutely no notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lord Spongefrog, (I am a flesh-eating robot)  09:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Stagecoach Manchester. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Charles (talk) 21:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Explaining
I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 23:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah right that makes sense, thanks for clarifying. I've never come across patrolling before so I was a little confused, and when I read the page I wasn't aware it applied to users too. Apologies.  DevilboyScooby  12:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)