User talk:Devilishlyhandsome/archive

Personal attack at User talk:LoveMonkey ==

In this edit you threatened off-wiki consequences to User:LoveMonkey from people at the Orthodox Church if he persists in his current position. Not only is this a personal attack on LoveMonkey, your threats place you at risk of a block. Please cease this abuse unless you want to get unfavorable attention from admins. As a brand-new user with very strong opinions you are already in a peculiar position. These comments to LoveMonkey do nothing for your reputation. If you have scholarly information that would help the article you are welcome to present it on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes Ed, I do have scholarly information but actually it was the other user who changed the topic from the article to a personalized topic, myself. Now I will ask that you distinguish between unethical off-wiki consequences, which are grounds for sanctions, and what is perfectly ethical, which is to present to public opinion the actual facts of the case. Anonymous posting should not be a means of intellectual dishonesty or personalizing what are philosophical issues. So I wonder if you get my point regarding the distinction between an off-wiki consequence which is wrong, unethical, etc., and one which is perfectly legitimate, specifically, presenting to public opinion the facts of a case, ie., that someone with an explicit agenda manipulated events to get someone into a hassle at WP resulting in constriction of their rights of self-expression, which, IMHO, is exactly what is going on here. I try to work on the article and talk about the article, and he derails it now into making me personally the object of attention.