User talk:Devin18

Regarding your edits to Mitochondrial DNA:
Your recent edit to Mitochondrial DNA (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Mitochondrial disease:
Your recent edit to Mitochondrial disease (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop blanking complete articles. If you believe an article contains a copyright violation, remove the offending text and leave the other elements of the article (references, categories, interwiki links) intact. Owen&times; &#9742;  19:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing Mitochondrial Eve
You blanked the whole page here and here. Your comment read: his is direct plagiarism of book entitled: "Mitochondrial DNA/Mitochondrial Eve". Fred Hsu 22:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

This is a deliberate lie. Check out the dozens of changes and rewrites done within less than a week in Feb 2007. Now, tell me this article is direct plagiarism of another book again. Fred Hsu 22:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing Mitochondrial DNA
You have blanked Mitochondrial DNA at least 5 times in 6 hours. You claim that the page contains plagiarism, but this is not plausible. The article cites a dozen references and has hundreds of contributions (393 edits to date). Therefore your continued removal of content is vandalism. 216.68.56.218 01:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop reverting your vandalism
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. 216.68.56.218 01:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)