User talk:Devinjck

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Hello Devin. My name is Michael, I am introducing myself as a classmate from English 1101 composition. This is my first time using Wikipedia edits, how about you? Coovmich (talk) 05:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

E-Services Peer Review
E-service article does a good job at listing the different areas of e-service, but it could use some brushing up in content instead of just bullet points. I like the use of the links in this article that relate to e-service. Naturally, the definition of e-service is very broad, a condensed re-structure of a more understanding definition could help. It looks like some citations need to be added in a few areas. As well as some information is old and could be updated finding new, more reliable sources. The most important way to improve this article is to add more content. After reviewing your article, it has given me some insight on how to improve my own. Coovmich (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.129.13.16 (talk) 04:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

I think the article starts out pretty good but then I quickly got distracted trying to keep track of the subheadings. I think maybe narrowing down or even combining some of the article, instead of trying to hit all the different points at once would help it feel focused. I do think that you should expand on some of the sections and give it some more content to work with. Kirbkati (talk) 00:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

E-services
Hi! I wanted to drop you a note about your additions to e-services. The section is overall good, however I need to caution you about relying too heavily on WP:PRIMARY sources (things released by the businesses you're writing about) and about editorializing. By this I mean that while the content is good, you need to be careful not to include things that could be seen as personal opinions on the businesses. It can be tough to catch this when you first start editing, so it's something to keep an eye out for. I know that it was something I had an issue with when I first began editing. I did some editing to help with this, so no worries.

Other than that, the content looks good! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)