User talk:Devoid of Life

==Notability of Raffaele Ienco== A tag has been placed on Raffaele Ienco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me! / Talk to me! ←at≈:→ 18:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Devoid of Life
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Devoid of Life, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Yilloslime (t) 18:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I was the person who redlinked to the potential article and, given more time, it could be expanded into a solid well-rounded article. I know it was blanked and so speedied but if the PROD had been left up it would have at least been possible to do enough to improve the article we we could remove the PROD warning and give the article a decent foundation for further improvement (I had the page on my watchlist so would have picked it up quite quickly). Anyway just a note to the person who created the article to say they needn't have been so hasty in removing it and they are always welcome to ask for help and advice on the Comics Project talk page (or they can drop me a note on mine if they'd prefer). (Emperor (talk) 15:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC))