User talk:Devprogrammer789

Welcome!
Hello, Devprogrammer789, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Electronic Design (magazine), which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  14:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

AdaCore sources
Good work on the AdaCore article. It was reverted. Someone said there weren't enough things showing notability. Here are some sources:


 * https://slashdot.org/story/03/03/27/2246238/fsf-announces-corporate-patronage-program
 * http://www.drdobbs.com/tools/adacore-releases-major-new-gnat/240163965
 * http://www.drdobbs.com/embedded-systems/adacore-releases-gnat-pro-safety-critica/240149765
 * https://bit-tech.net/news/tech/cpus/nvidia-adacore-partnership-telegraphs-risc-v-shift/1/
 * https://hub.packtpub.com/adacore-joins-the-risc-v-foundation-adds-support-for-c-and-ada-compilation/
 * http://mil-embedded.com/news/adacore-announces-extended-support-for-wind-river-vxworks/
 * https://www.embedded-computing.com/embedded-insiders/five-minutes-with-quentin-ochem-director-adacore

March 2021
Hello Devprogrammer789. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Electronic Design (magazine), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Devprogrammer789. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. This diff shows that you are the editor of the magazine Fiddle   Faddle  14:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Electronic Design (magazine) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Electronic Design (magazine), needs to be reviewed in WP:AfC, becausei t was written as a a paid editor. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article titl e) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article  has substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices   references in proper format, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 04:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Electronic Design (magazine)(version 2) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electronic Design (magazine)(version 2) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Electronic Design (magazine)(version 2) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Multi7001 (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)