User talk:Dewy60

Speedy deletion nomination of DA Leaf in the Wind
Hello Dewy60,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DA Leaf in the Wind for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Olowe2011 (talk) 21:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Leaf in the Wind, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 00:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Iron Man 3 because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iron Man 3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Avengers (2012 film), you may be blocked from editing. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

This is your second major warning. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue vandalising, as you did at The Dark Knight Rises, I will look at reporting you, and you may be blocked from editing. drewmunn talk 19:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I am going to assume good faith here; you persist in adding point of view comments to articles about film releases. Box office success, box offic bomb, etc. You must not do this, and I will block you from editing here if you do it again. No further warning will be issued.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reverted your edits to Scary Movie. The films you quote as spin-offs are not, they are merely films of the same genre. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Avatar (2009 film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. WP:TRIVIA applies. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 22:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Spencer T♦ C 22:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Still Mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hope Springs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Smgo.tv concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Smgo.tv, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Smgo.tv


Hello Dewy60. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Smgo.tv.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Life of Brian (Family Guy). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, your edit to the Brothers Quay page is incorrect. The project they are currently working on is not an interactive film. It is a video game and companion film piece. Thank you - polarbear7777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polarbear7777 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/smgo.tv concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/smgo.tv, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/smgo.tv


Hello Dewy60. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "smgo.tv".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 09:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

the source says nothing of the sort, fanboy
You should really not be editing Wikipedia.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hi. I saw you added a review from a blogger at Blogspot. Wikipedia generally does not allow self-published sources, such as blogs, unless they are written by an acknowledged expert who is writing about his or her area of expertise. This would include a published physicist who comments about the physics in a science fiction film, for example. We generally don't allow film reviews from bloggers. You can read more about this at WP:RS and WP:V. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)