User talk:Dewythiel

Welcome!
Hello, Dewythiel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutralitytalk 15:31, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Important information regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people
Neutralitytalk 15:31, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a standard notification given to editors who edit in the topic area. Neutralitytalk 15:31, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Your recent editing history at Freedom Caucus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the one-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ''Please note that this page has a consensus Talk:Freedom_Caucus. Also, this article is under Discretionary Sanctions and article restrictions.'' – Lionel(talk) 11:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

3RR block
You have been blocked per WP:3RR for 24 hours. Andrevan@ 00:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

You’ll have to excuse Andrevan, they apparently don’t know how to issue a proper block template after a mere 13 years as an admin here. I’l do that for you now should you wish to appeal the block, and I have also already asked for an impartial review of this situation. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:34, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Rock on Beeblebrox. Drmies (talk) 01:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

You're unblocked. Consecutive edits count as one revert. --Neil N  talk to me 01:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Dewythiel, I'd love for you to explain to me why you have two accounts editing in the same area. Please answer soon or I'll have to block this one. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Damn, I stop looking at Wikipedia for a weekend and all this stuff happened? I'm not trying to abuse or troll, I don't know why the two of you are blocking me. Dewythiel (talk) 04:36, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Andrevan got a little het up and blocked you for edit warring, though I guess they say he was wrong. So NielN unblocked you. So then someone thought something looked, well, suspicious and ran a WP:checkuser. So that's when Drmies blocked you for sockpuppetry.Dloh cier ekim 's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 05:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
Please see WP:SOCK. Using two accounts, when you have not declared you are using two accounts, is abuse. Alternate accounts are permissible-- this is my non admin account for when I'm at work. (If someone hijacks this account by skimming my password it's no big deal.) At any rate, you will need to explain this two accounts business to have any hope of being unblocked. Might as well say it-- please disclose all accounts you are using on Wikipedia.Dloh cier ekim 's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 05:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that privacy was a legitimate reason to have more than one account. Basically one was for home and one was for work. But if it's such a big deal, my other account is waterbursa Dewythiel (talk) 06:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess this is what was asking. We'll see what he says. Not seeing how the privacy consideration applies in this case. There may be some consideration I cannot see as I am not a checkuser.Dloh cier ekim 's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 06:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)


 * User:Dlohcierekim's sock, how amusing that it's your sock responding here! Anyway, I was fine with an unblock and a one-account restriction, but given 's discovery, I'm going to pass the mic and let him decide on any unblock, and which account deserves to be unblocked. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)