User talk:DexW2Comm

October 2016
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

W2Comm (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 01:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi PhilKnight! As you know, I'm naturally a big fan of the assumption of good faith! However, the only thing that gives me pause is the user's user space User:W2Comm (see the deleted edit), which lists W2Comm as a web domain and clearly states that he represents a range of companies. I think that an unblock is perfectly fine, provided that he requests a username that represents individuality, as required by Wikipedia's username policy. When this is done, I say "go for it!" - let the user contribute if he/she wishes to do so positively! :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)