User talk:Dexdunkers

Deleting content
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bregenz without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Canterbury Tail talk 19:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Additionally read up on WP:VANDALISM and WP:NOTVANDALISM to determine what is vandalism before making edits accusing of vandalism. Canterbury Tail talk 19:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

I only made this Wikipedia account to vandalise articles Dexdunkers (talk) 19:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Why did I get banned and have all my edits deleted and how can this ban be lifted Dexdunkers (talk) 11:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough Dexdunkers (talk) 05:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Dexdunkers (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

So you think this is my final edit well i will prove to yous that this is not just look at my edits to the Bangor and Campbell College page and if you reject this appeal I will not hesitate to create false accounts and start a vandalism campaign the likes you’ve never seen before Thank you for reading and you now have to give my account back to it’ Rightful owner Dexdunkers (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

I have revoked your talk page access. Threats like that have no place here. Another admin will be along shortly to review your request. If declined, you still have WP:UTRS open to you. --Yamla (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS 34348
 [https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/34348 User requested unblocking at UTRS. The request is now closed.] -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 19:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 36496
 is now closed deepfriedokra	2020-10-29 11:12:06	I'm sorry, but as you have repeatedly inadequately addressed the reasons for your block, you are now ineligible for consideration at UTRS until six months from now. Please consider spending that time constructively and collegially editing other Wikimedia projects and other versions of Wikipedia. Please do not evade your block or use sock puppets. After at least six months of constructive, collegial editing have passed, you may again request unblocking. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 11:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)