User talk:Deysweta

Welcome!
Hello, Deysweta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Altered Walter (talk) 13:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Sandeep Dey


The article Sandeep Dey has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No assertion of notability per WP:CREATIVE or WP:BIO; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Altered Walter (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Walter,

I have cited some references to substantiate the wiki. They include web & print media references from 2011.

I am not sure whether being a producer, cinematographer & editor of a widely released feature film would suffice as 'notability'. If not, I believe we will have to wait until the notability criteria of Wikipedia are met. Just let me know so we make amicably go through the deletion process.

As mentioned in my earlier talk message to you, creating these wikis was one of the first steps in our publicizing the movie. We should soon have more references that can be cited to substantiate statements made in the wiki.

Deysweta (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of O.G.J.


The article O.G.J. has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreleased film with no assertion of notability per WP:NFILM; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Altered Walter (talk) 15:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Walter, Thanks for your welcome.

As is obvious, this is my first attempt at creating wikis. It is also true that I am associated with the wiki in question and currently there are no 'reliable' references available.

The wiki page was the first step of starting the publicity of our movie. We hope to have sufficient references in place before the Jan. 15th deadline of the proposed deletion. I will cite the references as they become available.

On the note of being objective, you will notice I have tried to be fairly 'adjective-free' in my contribution.

Please feel free to process the deletion if the citations are not made in time. In the cause of veracity and reliability of Wikipedia, no offense shall be taken. Deysweta (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, Deysweta. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sandeep Dey, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Altered Walter (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Dev Kharoud for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dev Kharoud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dev Kharoud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)