User talk:Dezidor/archiv3

POV
Not quite a political POV. There are several facts:

1) The government in which Nikolic was, was appointed by an illegitimate parliament, elected on forged votes from 1997.

2) During this time the entire infrastructure and economy of the country collapsed, with the inflation entering the Guines' record book.

3) The government attempted to solve civil crisis, separatism, rebellions, terrorism and unrest at the south, escalating into an open civil war, eventually leading to expulsions and displacement of over 800,000 people and more than 10,000 killed, with intense ethnic cleansing.

4) For a very poor policy, it faced sanctions and was cut off from the world, including bringing the country to intense heavy bombing from NATO for months.

5) It planned, conducted and almost finished a Joint Criminal Enterprise against the State, in which it robbed the national treasury and through a chain of links and controls of mafia and criminal groups (which repeatedly grew), stashed it at locations like Cyprus.

6) It had factually abolished democracy, freedom of speech and press independence, prosecuting all enemies and assassinating people like Slavko Ćuruvija and political opponents like Ivan Stambolić. There were numerous demonstrations and they were all broken by force and bloodshed.

7) It refused to recognize that it lost the 2000 election, deciding for a time to keep power forcibly. Tomislav Nikolic was the one of those who thought that administration should've not been handed over at all in the end. He also thought that FRY should not have succumbed to Western demands and that the bombing should've continued.

8) It conflicted the state with the only other member-state in the federation. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 23:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The word "Ill-famed" is your point of view. Many people like Tadić (50.57%), many people like Nikolić (47.71%). For Nikolić´s supporters is ill-famed Democratic Party, Dinkić and Tadić, for you is ill-famed SRS, Milošević and Nikolić. --Dezidor (talk) 11:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * That's what I'm trying to say - it's not. Perhaps not the best type of wording, but a notification is necessary.
 * This has nothing to do with the presidential election, or how many people like anyone (many people like Adolf Hitler too, btw), but simply that the 1998-2000 government was undeniably the worst in Serbia's history. This has nothing to do with what happened after 2000 or what happens today, and modern political popularity (should perhaps, Radovan Karadzic get reelected President of the Republic of Srbska) does not alter the events of the history. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 23:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Simon Mol
Nevím, do jaké míry je namístě znovu vytvářet na Wikipedii regulérně smazaný článek. Každopádně jsem obnovil jsem ho obnovil do User:Dezidor/Simon Mol. Před přesunem textu do prostoru encyklopedických článků (tj. Simon Mol) silně doporučuji požádat o radu na fóru administrátorů, nebo použít proces obnovy smazaných článků. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * O smazání se tu také hlasuje klidně i na šestý pokus... Pokud chci článek dopracovat, je efektivnější ,než to psát celé znova, vycházet z již existujího textu. --Dezidor (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Kaufmann AFD
Hey, I just had a look at Articles for deletion/Frank Kaufmann. I agree with you that the article was poorly written, though I had trouble figuring out what made him notable. I voted delete, and gave some reasons that maybe you'll agree with. If he is notable, I'd rather it get cleaned up than deleted, so I was wondering what you found him to be primarily notable as. Expanding on your notability comment might help that AFD's clarity. –MT 18:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Ron Paul
Ron Paul has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured quality. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 05:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)