User talk:Dfee2/sandbox

Miles Thompson Peer Review: 1. Do you see gaps that remain? Out of the content that you added I do not see many gaps. If you had to increase one part I would add more to the lead and Economic Definition. The lead is very concise, but does not cover anything discussed later on in the article. The economic definition is very short and has only one source from 2004.

2. Do you think they could make one or more points clearer? From what you have submitted I think your points were made clear. Perhaps touch on virginal capital a little more and why that's desirable among Christians. In the criticism section you reference "typical male sexuality". Can you define that a little clearer? Do you mean heterosexual males?

Thanks, let me know if you have issue with what I said!