User talk:Dfroberg

Welcome!
Hello, Dfroberg, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Al-Masdar News, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Specific issue
Please don't add WP:PROMO material as you did here. Thanks. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help Iryna, being neutral is darn hard :) Dfroberg (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed, it is! Unfortunately, I'm going to be flat out IRL for the next couple of weeks, so I possibly won't be able to stay on top of WP:NPOV development of the article. In as much as is possible, I'll respond to your content queries on article talk pages for the sake of transparency. Bear in mind that I cannot write on you behalf as that would be COI by proxy.


 * As a heads up, having created this account, it's possibly only a matter of time before lurkers and trolls get wind of it. The nature of the project is that 'anyone can edit', and the nature of a-M is that you deal in extremely sensitive subject areas, therefore vandalism of your user page is not out of the question. Please see WP:UP should you need to ask for page protection. As regards your own talk page, see WP:REMOVED. Note, also, that Wikipedia has a zero tolerance policy for WP:THREATs and WP:PERSONAL attacks, so please do report such activities should you be targeted in any way.


 * Apologies if this comes across as if I'm trying to put you off editing (and for being long winded). It is most certainly not my intention. If you have any other queries or concerns, please feel free to either leave a missive on my own talk page or ping me, and I'll respond as soon as I'm able. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the advice & guidance, I'm new at this! Dfroberg (talk) 02:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AMN Frontpage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AMN Frontpage.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t) Josve05a  (c) 11:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AMN Frontpage.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:AMN Frontpage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 00:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

What does "strong behavioral evidence" mean?! And technical evidence is quite impossible as I'm quite alone here, heck I even adjusted one comment where I forgot to login and commented in a discussion on a-M talk. Who am I suppoed to puppet be puppeted by?! Oddest thing though; don't seem to be a SPI opened against me, so how does that work? Dfroberg (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Favonian didn't say there was a sock puppet investigation. He carefully said there was a checkuser investigation. That was done by me. Just so it's clear to other administrators, the account you are accused of operating is . There are other accounts I blocked during my investigation. Those accounts are unrelated to you.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * & TheDaneChris is not my account. I've had no discussions with anyone with that username about wikipedia in any way shape or form! So what did your checkuser investigation unveil that linked me to him?! And what in heavens name does "strong behavioral evidence" even mean? That we debate the same WP articles? That we strike the letter A on our keyboards in the same manner!? We are in the same timezone/continent? Please elaborate. Dfroberg (talk) 17:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)