User talk:Dfsghjkgfhdg

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 03:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your username
Hi ehm... Dfsghjkgfhdg. I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, but don't you think your username is a bit... confusing? Just a suggestion, but you might want to change it to something else by placing a request at WP:CHU. A namechange request is usually handled within a few hours, and will result in the reattribution of all your edits to your new account. Cheers, Face 19:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I thinl the username is great. Good one Dfsghjkgfhdg. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks :). Dfsghjkgfhdg (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

The letter H
The H in certain words is so faint that the vowel next to it takes over, ie. "An hour", which you pronounce as "an our".-- OsirisV (talk) 00:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I am very much aware of the silent presence of the letter "H" in certain words in English, but it is grammatically incorrect. It is also incorrect to say "an hour", but it is common with that particular word because of the silence of the "H" misleading the mind, making it more intuitive to use "an" instead of "a" because the word starts with a vowel sound.  "An homage" is not proper English.  Dfsghjkgfhdg (talk) 04:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have never seen any source suggesting something like "an hour" is grammatically incorrect, and several of my past English teachers would more than happily disagree with you on the matter. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, my experiences are obviously different. Check the Elfen Lied talk page for the full discussion, where sources are provided.  Dfsghjkgfhdg (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Personal comment on discussion @ Talk:Glenn Beck
Good hello. Just wanted to let you know that if you found my post truly insulting or even just snarky enough to be taken as an insult to you then I am sorry that was certainly never my intent. In no way did I mean to insult or ridicule you, your friends or any other editor there. You and I seem to be approaching the topic from different points of view but that, I think, is part of the collaborative environment that makes Wikipedia great. No, I am in no way opposed to seeing some of Beck's controversies in the article. Seriously, check out Andy Rooney; it seems that every time Rooney said something that upset more than 3 people is listed in his article. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 02:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha, you misunderstand. I intended that as a joke.  I wouldn't actually become offended over something so silly.  The rest was not really aimed at you in particular, so much as other editors who are trying very hard to keep Beck's article crystal clear of anything negative about him.  Dfsghjkgfhdg (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Gibraltar
Apologies, we get a lot of random vandalism although it does not usually last long. I still don't understand what it was about. --Gibnews (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". --John (talk) 20:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Cthulu
"NPOV" - what? It is an article about a fictional cult which is by Lovecraft's own writing described as horrid - that isn't a point of view issue. No one is saying, "hey, that Cthulu guy, he isn't that bad." Ignignot (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You can't call the chant horrid by itself. You either have to exclude the description or say that Lovecraft describes it as horrid to maintain NPOV.  Dfsghjkgfhdg (talk) 21:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dark Was the Night, Cold Was the Ground, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 01:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 03:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Notability and albums
WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Social insertion
Hi How goes it. The article was reverted as it was unsourced. It was reviewed in page review, i.e. WP:NPP. They're is no sources on it. I can sent it to draft if you want to work on there?  scope_creep Talk  23:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)