User talk:Dgarrett12101984

In response to your feedback
Well, some discussions on articles are very opinion-based, some of them necessarily so. I thank you for your corrections, but there are some discussions that are not necessarily in the cut-and-dry-land of corrections.

I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 09:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

August 2012
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Presidency of Barack Obama. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You've made one or two arguably legitimate edits here, but overall you just seem to be using this account to vent. Please be aware that these are encyclopedia articles meant for the public to read, not a forum for anybody's personal gripes and opinions (there are plenty of websites where you can do that).  If you want to do some good here and participate in building the encyclopedia, please read the rules about editing articles and try to help out where you can.  Otherwise, this would be considered a sing-purpose account or a "vandalism-only account", and subject to being blocked indefinitely.  Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 00:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

1st lets be clear that you are not speaking to a child. 2nd I stated what other people opinions were on the subject matter. 3rd you are telling me that republican obstructionism is an opinion and not a fact? If so it seems to me like you are the one venting by deleting things you deem not in agreement with your view point. Last everything in my post was correct, the lady journalist did in fact write that article, Mitch did actually say what it said and republicans, independents and democrats have all stated that these things were going on. But hey what do I know right? If you want to suspend me or label me a vandal so be it. I have 10 other computers in my house all with their own IP addresses. I am a very serious person don't disrespect someone because you think you can SIR.
 * There is a misunderstanding: Who you are or what you think is totally irrelevant. The text you added had absolutely no references. It therefore doesn't matter whether or not what you wrote was correct or incorrect. If you do not show where the information comes from, it will be pointed out to you. If after that you re-instate it, it is considered vandalism. You do it again, you will be blocked. Read WP:RS. Thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:00, 18 August 2012

If you would of just said the article needed references in the first place instead of getting smart we wouldnt of had this issue. Who I am is irrelevant you are very much correct about that. Again with the threats on being block? Obviously you didnt get where I stood on that in my above statement. Talk to people like you have some common sense the next time you try to correct someone. In fact you should try starting with stating exactly what the person did wrong so they can try to resolve the issue at hand. You don't get points for being disrespectful. So thanks.
 * Good. The first two messages in this thread are from a set of templates that are sent out. If you could tell us exactly where the first message ("Hello and thank you...") was disrespectful, we can change those. Thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Ok they were templates. "You've made one or two arguably legitimate edits here, but overall you just seem to be using this account to vent." "personal gripes and opinions (there are plenty of websites where you can do that)". "If you want to do some good here"  Thats an opinion, or better yet its an opinion of what you say is a template and it's poorly worded and very rude. So who ever wrote those "templates" should not be in the providing of customer service profession. I guess it never occured to the template writers that most people don't deliberately try to not follow their rules it usually happens from lack of proper instructions and assumptions. Thanks
 * Of course, those are not templates. I specifically asked about the first lines. Things got heated after you simply re-instated your comments. And no-one here is in the "customer service profession" since you are not a customer. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

No really? You don't say. How did "things get heated after I simply re-instated my comments" when you and I never spoke until you dicided to play editor and chief? Further more I do think wikipedia would disagree with you on the point of me not being a customer. Wikipedia is a product and even though it's free to use, it only remains up and running because of viewers and users or in layman turns....customers use of the product.
 * Yes really. And get that thing off your shoulder. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Trust me, there's no chip on my shoulder. And if there was I would invite you to come knock it off. Now take that stick out your...(feel free to fill in the blank)___.
 * You are certainly responding like a rebellious youngster. Why not try to figure out how Wikipedia works instead of getting into flame wars with various users who are giving you cautions?  Now that you've edited articles you're one of the volunteer customer service reps yourself, not just a consumer.  Nobody's going to hold this against you, Wikipedia is a chaotic self-regulated place and we all had some bumps and confrontations before finding a good niche.  If you're interested in being part of the project you can start at WP:WELCOME.  Normally, new accounts get that template soon after joining, before they have a chance to stir up any trouble.  Cheers, - Wikidemon (talk) 16:26, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Obviously our conversation had ended and for you to jump into it is very child like and rebellious on your own part. Now please stop commenting on my talk page and go back to editing the site. Thank you.