User talk:Dgw/Archives/7

New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 18:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

My talkpage
cheers!  James086 Talk &#124;  Email 14:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not a problem; happy to help! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 14:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Economy Candy
It is a candy store in NY. I was going to put that it was a stub and needed expansion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ro098 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Re. 6
K, won't, thanks. :) --59.164.116.44 (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Much appreciated! :) —— Ryan • t  | c  16:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. You're quite welcome! :-) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 16:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

re: sexiestman
I'd like to know why you deleted my inciteful article on the History of the World's Sexiest Man competition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allahistheonetruegod (talk • contribs) 16:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nothing has been deleted yet; you can still add hangon to contest the deletion. To me it looks like nonsense, but if other editors disagree the page will be fine. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 16:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Joe Louis
Hello, for some reason you just reverted my Joe Louis edit. I think the flag icons for Schmeling and Hans Birkie should be the same. Idealy the german flag at the time. I certanly makes no sense having Birkie with the Nazi Germany flag and Schmeling with the Germany flag - both are from the same country, same era. Please either redo my edit or change both to the modern German flag —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.184.52.70 (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Nevermind, i undid your undo myself as I confirmed that the "Nazi Germany" flag was the national flag at the time

Also, this is my account --Flatfish89 (talk) 21:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I had been seeing that same edit over and over in huggle, which meant I wasn't the only one to revert it. The first couple times I was merely mildly suspicious, but the fact that it was repeatedly reverted led me to do so myself. Now that you've confirmed the information, I'm not going to go in and undo your undo of my undo; that would just be bad form. :D
 * As a side note, I don't think you were editing under your account. For all I know, your account is on the

huggle whitelist and would have allowed the edits to be ignored. Anonymous/IP users tend to get the shaft around here when it comes to vandalism patrol, so if you have an account I would advise you to make sure you're using it when you edit. Cheers! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 14:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

SupplyFrame links
Hello. Please reconsider your view on the value of links to an external reference information for SupplyFrame. The external links added to the SupplyFrame reference site are valid, contextual and valuable.

They are added per the Wikipedia policy on External Links, What should be linked to #3

"Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons."

SupplyFrame is an electronic engineering reference site populated directly with industry neutral technical content and datasheets authorized by 2,300 partnered global manufacturers and their franchised distributor.

While there are numerous external links on Wikipedia to 1 or 2 manufacturers - SupplyFrame provides the content on all manufacturers through one source. This is not spam, it's an tool used by electronics designers worldwide to research electronic components such as the 2N3906. SupplyFrame is a publicly accessible site that requires no registration. SupplyFrame is a member of the National Electronics Distributor Association. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcurie (talk • contribs) 18:35, May 18, 2008


 * I see you dug out an old account to try to become more credible, as well as attempt to create an article on SupplyFrame (now deleted). The history of 2N3906 does not show any contributions from a user named Jcurie; it shows a reverted edit by the IP address 68.4.114.227. Not having access to CheckUser, I cannot verify that you are the same person or not (nor would that be a valid reason to check anyway). However, if you are, your contribution history consists mostly of adding links to SupplyFrame. Other users have reverted your contributions. I'm inclined to agree with the others that what you are doing is spamming.
 * While SupplyFrame is listed on a few sites (like CrunchBase), I'd have to see corroboration from other electronics industry representatives before accepting it as the widely-used information source you say it is.
 * Lastly, I should mention that your omission of a signature does not impress me. It's nothing personal; I just hate having to sign things for people when SineBot doesn't do its job... Call me a nitpicker if you like. :P Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 18:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Revert
Hi there. I dont mean to jump on you but your revert here should not have been a revert but a CSD as it was the creator that had blanked the page.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 18:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I noticed that right after it had been completed, then you tagged the CSD. I already left a message on your page about it; thanks again! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 18:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Cosmic strings
I don't understand why you reverted the cosmic strings article and talk page. Cosmic strings are most certainly not singularities, nor are domain walls; they're all topological defects. Also, my comment on the talk page explained the 1-dimensionality thing, which no one had actually had an answer to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.152.39 (talk) 14:09, May 18, 2008
 * Let me check out those reverts. Good thing you have a short contribution history; it makes them easy to find. ;-)
 * Well, I undid my mistake on the talk page and I see you've already done so on the article (saving me the effort of clicking another link). I reverted because you didn't use an edit summary and were changing several facts. The patrol tool I use doesn't display relevant talk page conversations (yet; knowing that developer, something like that is probably in the works ;-). Hope I haven't caused you any undue stress/inconvenience/etc. Cheers! and thanks for contributing. Please forgive my mistakes; they happen once or twice a day, inevitably. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 19:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar! (mwahahahahaha!!!!) Happy Editing! Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 19:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikibreak message
Hi, Voyagerfan! You've been pretty active the past few days; you could just add to the top of userpage. It's your choice; this was just an idea for the WB header at the top :) Schfifty Three  01:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but unfortunately my editing is going to be more sporadic than just being busy weekdays. I'm often busy weekends, too. In fact, probably not much happening until next month. I'll update the box when I get around to it. (Read: start editing more regularly again.) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 06:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Issues with another user
Hi,

I found your nickname on the talk page of the ip address related to the computer i'm using. A user named schcambo is reverting my edits all the time on the Nantes article. Apparently there's been some kind of sockpuppet user using the same ip address (public place) and for unknown reasons user schcambo reverts all my edits. He left a message on the talk page saying i was vandalizing the article, but that's not true. I believe you are an administrator or a patroller, so could you try to tell user schcambo to accept others to make edits, as he keeps reverting wrong infos for instance on the transport section. Another patroller reverted my edits because user schcambo erased it, but he reveted his old version and i believe user schcambo doesn't own the article. Could you answer me on the talk page related to the ip i'm using? i'd be grateful. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.101.63.39 (talk) 13:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * A checkuser case confirmed the IP was a sockpuppet of Firstwind, who was permanently blocked a while back for persistent abuse, mainly on Nantes and Tramway de Nantes. Shock horror, but the most recent edits have been on those two articles. Anyways, you can disregard this section as you wish. I had already notified it to Ground Zero, the original involved admin. Thanks. --Schcambo aon scéal? 16:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

More help, again, for a script related thingy..
Ya, I finally figured out, with Xenocidic's help how to make my statustab fully automated. There's just one problem: The way the script is done, the template must remain empty. So, if I want it to be automated it must have nothing in it, like, no |in |out, etc. Basically, what I want is, I want the 'in' link to change it so there is no |, currently I have it set so that there is a |, only because I don't know what I'm doing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daedalus969 (talk • contribs) 19:58, May 28, 2008
 * These modifications are untested, but they should work.
 * First, replace


 * with


 * Then change


 * to


 * That should make it do what you want, unless some flaw crept into my thought process. It is a bit late. Sorry I took so long; I've been really busy elsewhere and with other (less fun) things. ;-) Cheers! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 06:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Didn't work....—  Dæ dαlusT@lk / Improve  Contribs  20:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Greetings
Hey thanks for the introduction, this all seems well over my head as I don't really know where to begin. Did you create the page with the cookies as that was a good gesture? I will sit down when I get a chance and try and familiarise with the editor.

Joe Dawson Joe Dawson (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Most of the templates here were done by other people. That's just one option in a list. I thought it suited the situation, because we'd already been talking on Twitter. Perhaps reading Help:Contents/Getting started would be a good start to figuring this place out. Cheers! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 13:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

JBS editor you are warning
This is actually User talk:Publiusohio who had a 3 hour block recently. What's normal here? Move the warnings to his ordinary page? They need to be kept together I'd think. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 12:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd say that, without a Checkuser, the account is merely a suspected "sockpuppet" of that anon. I believe the warnings stay on the pages of the users to whom they were issued, regardless of whether or not the two accounts are suspected of being the same person. I've been out of touch for a long while, but I think that's how it's supposed to work... ;-) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 12:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, he's added publiusohio to the entry on the JBS talk page. I need to find an admin to do a checkuser, right? Doug Weller (talk) 12:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Try Requests for checkuser; there are very few users authorized to use the CheckUser tool, and you have to have a very good reason for even requesting that it be used. I believe the policies are all written out on that page. :-) Reviewing them, I'm not sure this case qualifies, but use your own judgment. Cheers! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 12:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I may try the admin who gave him the block first. Doug Weller (talk) 13:15, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No need, he managed to provoke a 48 hour block himself. Doug Weller (talk) 16:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

AAU reminder notice

 * Notice delivery by xenobot  14:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the message you sent me?
I do not recall a single point in editing anything on Wikipedia. Could you please be specific of exactly how I made any violation? Which page do you accuse me of? Is this a common error sent out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.19.123 (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It was six months ago; if you don't remember editing Wikipedia, it's probably left over from a time when your IP address was being used by someone else. Don't worry about those two warnings; they were directed at someone else. :-) (Not to mention the article I warned you about was deleted about three weeks later...) Cheers! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 00:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Mahler's inequality
I don't think the article is short nor lacking context. Please respond to my comment at the talkpage of the article. -- Taku (talk) 23:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

What is THIS about?? Please use some common sense. Your proposed speedy deletion is absurd and offensive. The article is a worthwhile contribution to Wikipedia. Don't behave like a bull in a china shop just destroying things because you don't instantly understand them. The article has plenty of context and is clearly written. Michael Hardy (talk) 07:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Why are you coming here to yell (all-caps, your tone) at me for something that was rectified nearly two days ago? It doesn't make sense; the tag is long gone, and C S has made me aware of my mistake. (You have read Talk:Mahler's inequality, right?) I apologize for my error, but hasn't it been taken care of? If I'm missing something, please do tell me. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 18:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

As long as there is no transparency in speedy deletions, I will probably continue to be alarmed at any hint of the sort of thing that went on for six weeks or so late last winter. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tuvok: you should probably have a look at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. FWIW, I think this should have ended with the conversation at Talk:Mahler's inequality as well. Darkspots (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Darkspots. It looks like it's winding down, so I'll lie low. :-) I would rather not risk fanning the flames and causing my own resignation from Wikipedia because of a long-fixed mistake. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 22:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I would really hope that you wouldn't leave over this. Everyone makes mistakes; what's important is what you do after the mistake, and you did the right thing. You're an important contributor to the project; this is one small thing. Darkspots (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Heavens no, you'd have to fight me very hard to get me to leave Wikipedia. I knew I should have put a :P or ;) or something after that comment... :) Cheers, and thanks for the kind words! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 00:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * See you 'round the 'pedia—Darkspots (talk) 00:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

you have been outstanding Voyagerfan.Please do not get demotivated.As I told you a year ago.You can became an admin.You are totally dedicated.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, I scared more people than I thought I would... Thanks for the kind words, the encouragement, and again for the barnstar. Maybe I'll aim to run for admin at the end of the school year; it'd be a heck of a graduation present. ;) See ya' around, Pharaoh! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 08:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * PS: Interesting that you messaged me, considering that I just watched Elvis-Pharaoh in Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat two hours ago. Hmm... ;)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hevn anime.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hevn anime.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If anybody looks here, I was just giving an image with a meaningless name a proper title. Be my guest with the delete button; I have no particular fondness for that image. :) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 08:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Great Work

 * Thanks! That means a lot to me right now, since I can't edit as much as I'd like. :) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 08:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)