User talk:Dharam S Rajput

August 2015
Hello, I'm Altamel. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Charanjit Singh Channi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hi. You still haven't cited a source for the edit that I reverted. In addition, the new material you added appears to have been copied from the Hindustan Times, which is a violation of Wikipedia's policy against copyright infringement. Please do not add that text back unless you can paraphrase it in your own words and properly attribute it with a citation. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 10:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your addition to Charanjit Singh Channi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Altamel (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Person. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:New pages patrol‎, you may be blocked from editing. -- samtar talk or stalk 09:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhupinder kumar sharma TINKA


A tag has been placed on Bhupinder kumar sharma TINKA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 09:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 12:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Udyog sampark kendra
Hello Dharam S Rajput,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Udyog sampark kendra for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Udyog_sampark_kendra&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Udyog Sampark Kendra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Udyog Sampark Kendra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Udyog Sampark Kendra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrumSalad (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Udyog Sampark Kendra (USK)


Hello, Dharam S Rajput. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Udyog Sampark Kendra (USK).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)