User talk:DharmaOrg

Links to social media sites
Hi, regarding your edits at Vishnu Gupta: we don't keep links to social media sites in the "External links" sections of articles. This is documented in item #10 of WP:ELNO. Thank you and happy editing! Uanfala (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, DharmaOrg. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Hindu Sena, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Vanamonde (talk) 14:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Hindu Sena does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Vanamonde (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Vanamonde (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Hindu Sena. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Items to the left of an "=" sign in the infobox template CANNOT be changed - there is only a certain list of items that can be used Ron h jones (Talk) 16:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 17:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)