User talk:Dharmadhyaksha/Archive 2023

Orphaned non-free image File:Kohram.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kohram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Marathi Bhasha Gaurav Din
Hi, as you may know, that today is 'Marathi Bhasha Gaurav Din' while on 1st may it's Marathi Language Day. As my english is not so perfect, will you creat a new page 'Marathi Bhasha Gaurav Din' and correct the old one 'Marathi Language Day'. Santosh 10:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thanks a lot for pointing it out. I will make the necessary changes soon. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Gentle Reminder please.- Santosh 15:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Hope that's ok. You can also edit it to make necessary changes. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Regarding Caste
नमस्कार! I got a notice on my talk page from Abecedare against my inclusion of castes into BLP, saying that it was defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy''. He urged me to refer to WP:CASTEID which I got around to read through today. From what I can see, You were among the few who were in support of inclusion if it was from a reliable source. First of all, I just want to thank you for discussing on that poll with such perseverance and bravery, even after being shut down by various other users. I share your opinion too, but it appears that the Western editors do not agree with equalyl experienced editors like you and apply their logic to Indian articles too and simply say caste is irrelevant. An example is Anand Abhyankar, where it is well known that Abhyankar is an assal Chitpavan Brahmin surname without any exclusions. However, it is not included in the article. My point being here that, what do you think the future lies in doing? Should I move on from this? धन्यवाद |

~चैतन्य जोशी ChaitanyaJo (talk) 03:35, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello Well.... the gap between Indian and western editors will always be present in this or many other aspects. There is no way to remove it completely. But one can try to reduce it; although you should pick your battles wisely. Now coming to your specific point of Abhyankar's article, i agree with the CASTEID that the caste must be "self identified" by the subject. Example, Abhyankar may have given some interview about which caste he belongs to, or how his upbringing in that family was, or how he attends events in public held for the people of that caste. What i understand currently is that you are deducting that Anand is Chitpavan Brahmin just from the basis of his surname. In such case; it would be wrong to write in his article about the caste. However, if supported by RSes, you can mention the common surnames of Chitpavan Brahmins on the article of Chitpavan Brahmins and/or the article of Abhyankar. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand. Thank you. ChaitanyaJo (talk) 12:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Indic Script consensus
Please kindly read my discussion under User_talk:Javierfv1212 and User_talk:Symphing12 and maybe let's begin anew a talk about consesus on using Indic Scripts, because I think those contained in Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_48 (re:lead)] and Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_64 (re:infobox) are dated. noychoH (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Muthukrishnaperi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muthukrishnaperi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Muthukrishnaperi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)