User talk:Dharmalion76

Tharshan Thiyagarajah
Please do not add the part "He is the most popular contestant in Big Boss Tamil Season3 and real winner of the show. A king remains as King even without his empire and throne". It is a form of favouritism and you need an article proof about this news. It is considered as vandalism. Thank you for understanding :) Special Editor 2019 (talk) 08:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

= I referenced PhilPapers, 'Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation' =

To show two kinds of self in meditation, focused and open; attitudes-practices towards self, are to remember oneself or self remembering through the senses, to be open to the appearance of self; this philosophy of self article seems about the observation of the 'independence' of self. thanksArnlodg (talk) 00:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

re: Peggy Hettrick murder case edits Sep 2019
Apologies for the late reply. It has been some time since I was on the site. An old colleague of mine actually worked this case, so I am familiar with it. I think I was visiting the page to begin with because I was collecting research material for an article and the case wandered across my mind and there was something I wanted to check. I don't recall the exact edit I made at the time, but I do recall why I made the edit. As I was reading the page people had put together there was a section that came across as opinion, not fact (or expert opinion). I don't recall if there was a reference attached to the statement. If there was, I am certain that I looked into it and concluded that the reference was not reliable. As someone who works in forensics myself, I think it's important to not confuse opinion for fact, especially in cases where the end result is not entirely conclusive. Regards, E. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evellion (talk • contribs) 09:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Buddhist actors has been nominated for deletion
Category:Buddhist actors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2021 (UTC)