User talk:Dharpanwarind

Vandalism
Hii @Dharpanwarind, i have noticed that you have made repeated attempts to edit Bhoyar Pawar page in such a way that can create disputes among creater. As already mentioned, Bhoyar (72 kul) and Powar (36 kul) are two different communities. Though they do not share same customs and traditions. During ancient times, the Panwar Rajput clan have been divided into several groups which later developed into castes. The Malwa Parmars, Powars and Bhoyars share the same Panwar ancestory. According to bhats (genealogists), the Malwa Parmar ( 52 kul ),  Powar ( 36 kul ) and Bhoyar ( 72 kul ) shares same ancestors. When Rajput Panwars migrated to different parts of the country, some groups of these Panwars developed into a seperate caste. At present, they have now entirely lost thier position as rajputs. These castes are not related to each other nor they accept relationships with each other. But they all are agnivanshi Kshatriyas of Panwar clan. As i have cleared your doubt regarding this topic. I humbly request you to not to edit any Wikipedia page in such a way that it can create disputes among editors and repeated misleading edits can cause vandalism which is strictly forbidden in Wikipedia. If such behaviour by you continues, I'm sry to say you that you will be blocked from editing. Thank you Akash Kaushik (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Increasing vandalism
Hii @Dharpanwarind, i have noticed that you have made repeated attempts to edit Bhoyar Pawar page in such a way that can create disputes among creater. If you continue this behaviour, you will be blocked from Wikipedia. Sanjay Singh Panwar (talk) 16:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Its ok, but Bhoyar people are trying to include their cast in Panwar or Parmar kshtriya. Parmar or Panwar never called as Bhoyar or Bhoyar Pawar. In past few people of Panwar kul joined this caste and the whole Bhoyar or Bhoya or Bhoier cast of central India are trying to claim themself their whole hundred kul as mentioned by Russel as Panwar or Parmar Rajput. The wiki admins were requested to verify their claims from original source and then only it should be approved. The Parmar Rajput history is very much clear and it must be protected. Dharpanwarind (talk) 16:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)