User talk:Dhavan123

Welcome! Remember to have fun

Warning
Oh dear, oh dear.

Hi, this message doesn't mean to hurt you or your acquaintance (or sockpuppet) User:Arvindrockz but your website certainly is not notable. Firstly, I reverted your edit on the Aayirathil Oruvan article as the source (Clapsandboos) is unreliable. The site only consists of fans posting their reviews and their so-called "scores".

Secondly, your companion's addition:

"Most users at ClapsAndBoos.com gave the movie overwhelmingly positive respone and as of Jan 26, 2010 the movie ha garnered a "Popular Movie Score" of +3 and a "Loudmouth Score" of +1 on the meter.[36] To address a lot of criticism and hidden layers in the movie, ClapsAndBoos.com came up with an article titled "Decoding Aayirathil Oruvan", which touched upon the hidden elements in a conversational approach[37]"

...at the end of the day these statements mean nothing and offer nothing in terms of review or reception of the film. Also ClapsandBoos is not notable and probably doesn't enjoy much hits, so it is irrelevant of the response that people there give out - if we have to include this why not Mayyam Hub or Twitter or so forth. Secondly, the terms you have used with "Loudmouth Score" etc - is very very unfamiliar and very unsuitable for an encyclopaedia - and espescially for an article such as Aayirathil Oruvan, which is shortly to processed as a WP:GA. Thirdly the blog like article is also unusable on this. The only official verified content from Tamil movies used on this are Behindwoods, Sify, Rediff, Indiaglitz and Top10cinema amongst prominent newspapers as well as some acceptable other sites - even Galatta.com fails as a blog like spam site.

Thirdly, it doesn't help your cause when you make numpty edits (four in your account) (or is the other your sockpuppet?) and goes around making a pathetic rant asking him to give details. Moreover such pathetic forms of publicity seeking such as this edit here by that user: downgrades your chance of being reliable. Edit constructively, your obviously new to Wikipedia, so I won't begin a sockpuppet investigation or report you for breaking the 3 reverts rule.

Furthermore, in answer to all your rhetorical questions, yes. Moreover, I don't care who you are or what you do - when it comes to adding sources, add reliable ones, get the flow?

Universal Hero (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Universal Hero (talk) 19:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)