User talk:Dhawell.hlugalay

February 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Aung San Suu Kyi. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 19:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I strongly believe and can prove that all my edits are with valid references from credible sources. I have used the United Nations Protocol ; the Myanmar 2008 Constitution ; and the State Counsellor Bill plus a few other reliable sources. Please specifically mention which edit has broken which rule; never ever do blanket reverts, which is a total disregard of wikipedia community rules. I have also discovered that your reverts have violated WP:PUBLISHED rule. You are making assumption instead of using reliable sources. International media have only reported "under house arrest". Then, you have made your own conclusion (i.e. a primary source) which is in total disregard of wikipedia Wikipedia:RSPRIMARY rule.  I will give you one specific example. For example, if certain insurgents had a control over The White House and detained the President of The United States (POTUS), then could you say he was no longer the President. Definitely not, he is still a POTUS by the US Constitution and his presidency can be taken away only by means of the US Constitution. Please make sure you do have non-primary reliable sources with more validity than my sources when you do the next whatever reverts or edits. Dhawell.hlugalay (talk) 01:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Aung San Suu Kyi, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357  Talk 02:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Here are a few of the many reliable sources covering the coup:, , , , , . ― Tartan357  Talk 02:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing (repeatedly inserting fabrications). If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 02:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 40700
is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 07:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Feb, 2022
@: should I add the explanation here or should I open a new unblock request? Please advise and thank you. Dhawell.hlugalay (talk) 13:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You are free to make a new unblock request. WP:GAB goes into more detail. --Yamla (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)