User talk:Dhawk1964

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~ ; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! -- Runcorn 22:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Clean copy
Just noticed your addition to the Rockin' the Suburbs (song) page and just wanted to make some comments. Your addition featured quite a few misspelled words, fragmented sentences and mislinked phrases, which could be confusing to the average user.

It's important to be able to create copy that's clean and well-organized if you're going to add information, so please be careful to give your stuff a few more run-throughs before uploading it.

Hope this helps. Stick Fig 04:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Nasmith correspondence
Hi. This August you e-mailed Ted Nasmith about the use of his images on Wikipedia, right? Well, one I uploaded - Image:NasmithWitchKing.JPG - is currently marked with a "possible copyright violation" tag thanks to my formatting mistakes. It would help if we knew the precise naure of his permission (See my Talk page). Do you still have the correspondence or (more probably) did you delete it already? If you did, it's all right; we'll just have to contact him again. Uthanc 17:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it's still here, so I guess it's survived speedy deletion. I contacted Nasmith myself to have our licenses and permission updated, it apparently has deficiencies (see my talk page as well). So far, he hasn't answered, but our current permission still stands and hopefully, will satisfy and patrollers. Sorry, I should have noted this earlier. But thanks anyway. Uthanc 11:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Anything about the old permission? Under what conditions did he accept to? Uthanc 14:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of In Joy Still Felt
In Joy Still Felt, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that In Joy Still Felt satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/In Joy Still Felt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of In Joy Still Felt during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 11:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dhawk1964! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Pierre Dulaine -

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

"Ilmarin" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ilmarin. Since you had some involvement with the Ilmarin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Individuated Hobbit for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Individuated Hobbit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Individuated Hobbit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)