User talk:Dhawk790

Proposed deletion of Eli Kintisch


The article Eli Kintisch has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. --IShadowed 20:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Please read refs carefully
Please read references carefully before removing important information.

You made this revert here.

Your reason: "Neither source cited showed that the president was referring to the bombing."

This claim, however, goes against the second source, which says it quite explicitly in the title.

Also, please take note that the Wikipedia passage does not say he was referring to the attack, but was rather giving a speech, and this is what he said, which is particularly relevant the day after the attack.

Please revert your edit.

Thank you, and enjoy Wikipedia. -- Activism  1234  23:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. The quotes are accurate, when I was looking at the second source it seemed to be implying that the president was admiting responsibility, but the quotes themselves in the article certainly don't suggest that. Thanks for letting me know. Dhawk790 (talk) 23:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It's ok, we're all human and make mistakes. I apologize if my tone sounded like I was accusing you or being condescending, that certainly wasn't my intention. Thanks for understanding, cooperation is always a preferred path! -- Activism  1234  23:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * P.S. I notice that you've joined Wikipedia a few days ago. Enjoy your stay.  If you have any questions or issues, don't hestitate to contact me. -- Activism  1234  23:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Patrick Wensink
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Patrick Wensink, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.patrickwensink.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ben White (journalist)


The article Ben White (journalist) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Journalist stub with no independent refs and no claim of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, What Happened to the LA LA's


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, What Happened to the LA LA's. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Sticks and Stones. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sticks and Stones - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Fish Barking?  03:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shani Boianjiu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

ceasefire magazine nominated for deletion
you should be aware that an article you created is being nominated for deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2012_November_4#Ceasefire_.28magazine.29 Soosim (talk) 10:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Nines Music Festival


A tag has been placed on The Nines Music Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. APerson (talk!) 00:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben White (freelance writer)


A tag has been placed on Ben White (freelance writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 08:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Spooky Songs moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Spooky Songs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  02:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Astonishing Legends moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Astonishing Legends, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spooky Songs (November 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spooky Songs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spooky Songs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spooky_Songs Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spooky_Songs reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Draftified A Nation on Trial
Hello, an article which you created has lacked references for years, and remains a stub. I've moved it to Draft:A Nation on Trial, where you and other editors may continue to work on it. Please help make this article meet the standards of a standalone article, or to merge its contents to another article, perhaps to a section at Hitler's Willing Executioners. Please note that Drafts are deleted if nobody works on them for a long period; you can forestall deletion by moving the Draft to your own userspace, as a userspace draft, or I can do this for you, if you wish. , Mathglot (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nury Vittachi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert Einstein Institute. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Uyghur genocide; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 23:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * 1) I'm sorry. I didn't intend to get into an edit war. I was trying to correct an early edit where I referred to the AP instead of the BBC, so I tried to fix my original edit. I still feel that the source should be included. Dhawk790 (talk) 23:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification
— Mikehawk10 (talk) 20:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Spooky Songs
Hello, Dhawk790. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spooky Songs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Astonishing Legends
Hello, Dhawk790. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Astonishing Legends, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Astonishing Legends


Hello, Dhawk790. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Astonishing Legends".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow  Talk  15:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkistan Islamic Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kohistan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your addition to 2020 Olympics article
Hi there, just a quick courtesy message to let you know why I reverted your recent edit re. covid quarantine conditions at 2020 Summer Olympics. The information is perfectly valid and sourced, but please can you append it to the end of the relevant section of Concerns and controversies at the 2020 Summer Olympics article instead (see my edit summary). The Concerns and controversies section of the main olympics article is meant as a SUMMARY of information provided in the side article where it would make sense in context. Thanks, Rodney Baggins (talk) 10:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Yes, I just saw that there is a message to only add to the separate article, which is sensible. Dhawk790 (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm NoonIcarus. An edit that you recently made to Responses to the Venezuelan presidential crisis seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! NoonIcarus (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Responses to the Venezuelan presidential crisis, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. NoonIcarus (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Exercise Pacific Vanguard 2022 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Exercise Pacific Vanguard 2022, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Talk page etiquette
Please do not break up other people's comments with your own as you have now done twice at Talk:Taiwan, please review WP:TPO. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 19:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry. I thought they were separate comments because each paragraph had a separate ":" . Dhawk790 (talk) 19:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries, its a super easy mistake to make. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 19:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

==Discussion at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cyber_Anakin#A_mountain_out_of_molehill? Talk:Cyber Anakin#A mountain out of molehill?] and Talk:Cyber Anakin#Starting_over== You are invited to join the discussion at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cyber_Anakin#A_mountain_out_of_molehill? Talk:Cyber Anakin § A mountain out of molehill?] and Talk:Cyber Anakin#Starting_over. 41.180.216.238 (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

P.S. In there they argued on the reliability of Taiwan News. 41.180.216.238 (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * National Council (Switzerland)
 * added links pointing to French, German, Italian and Romansh

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Ben Norton. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf  (talk)  22:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I am sorry. I did not mean to do this. The page was only a re-direct to a publication that the subject of the article does not work for. Is there a way to re-move the re-direct and the entire page? Dhawk790 (talk) 22:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Exercise Pacific Vanguard 2022
Hello, Dhawk790. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Exercise Pacific Vanguard 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Exercise Pacific Vanguard 2022


Hello, Dhawk790. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Exercise Pacific Vanguard 2022".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
— Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 06:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BNO News is a reliable source on Wikipedia. If you believe it is not a reliable source (as you indicated in this edit), I highly encourage you to open a discussion at WP:RSN to deprecate BNO News. Until then, BNO News is a reliable source of information. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)