User talk:Dheslin

Hi, I take it you are new here and don't understand a lot about the way wikipedia works. Let me try to explain a few things.

First of all, please read this page. Any information added to the wikipedia must be verified by a scholarly source. If you don't have any source for your speculation other than your own website, it is called "Original Research" and it is not allowed. Also please look at This page.

Secondly, edit warring to get your original research into the article is not the wikipedia way. The procedure we prefer to use instead of continually reverting and re-reverting is called "Use the discussion page". Another thing you might want to try is called "Use the edit sumamry box". It's that little box you see at the bottom of the edit page that says "Edit summary: " ... I have sent messages to you in my edit summary box several times, advising you of the wikipedia policy not to post original research, and you can see all of these by looking at the article history for Book of Daniel. (Just go to the article and click the tab up top that says "History")... You have never responded, but always silently place the same original research material into the article with no explanation. So I figured maybe you didn't know about the edit summary box.

I am not trying to scare you off. If you have any knowledge or info about any subject that can be cited or verified by an independent source (ie, not yourself), by all means, add it to the encyclopedia. Have fun! Just stop trying to put your own ideas here. There are other places on the web for you to do that. If you feel there is some reason why your edit should appear in the article, the thing to do at this point would be to make some effort at communication, preferably on the Discussion page for Book of Daniel (conveniently located at Talk:Book of Daniel. Thanks!

--ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 01:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Sigh* Still not one word of communication on discussion page or anywhere else... You leave no choice but to contact an admin.. ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 15:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Dheslin, please stop adding your own research to the article. I understand that your opinion is interesting, but right now, we have no examples of it being discussed by reliable, published scholars on this subject. You should continue to use your own website to point out this insight, but you shouldn't try to add it into wikipedia until it has gained some measure of acceptance. --Alecmconroy 20:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)