User talk:Dhoom

Mahitgar 17:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi
and welcome to Wikipedia! Indian Navy contributions are most welcome, we don't know much about it. If you're not aware of it already, WikiProject Ships is a semi-organized system for consistency among ship articles, plus it's a way to find people to ask any questions about article organization that you might have. Stan 17:40, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Naval ensign
That's a nice upload of the ensign, and you seem to be conversant with the standards for using them. However, it is a little large! I would suggest that you use the wiki image markup to shrink the image down to a similar size to the other ensigns and jacks. I look forward to more coverage on Indian ships from you. David Newton 21:28, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Nonsense
Hello! Please don't post nonsense on Wikipedia. It's considered to be vandalism. - Lucky 6.9 04:31, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[[Image:Mallika.jpg]]
Hi. Thanks for adding the above image. It would be appreciated if you would indicate what copyright license it is under, and if necessary, where you got it from. If you have any other quesitons, feel free to make a note on my talk page. -Frazzydee 04:42, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Reply: Please categorize the people
Hi. I'm not categorizing, just removing unnecessary categories and changing categories :). By the way, when you leave a message on my talk page, you can leave your username/timestamp by putting four tilde characters, like this: ~ utcursch 08:13, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC).

Image:Kajol.jpg
Image:Kajol.jpg is copyrighted by someone else than you and not released under the GFDL I assume. Could you clarify on what grounds you think it isn't a copyright violation? --fvw* 11:30, 2004 Nov 21 (UTC)

Images uploaded by you
Hi I've listed the following images uploaded by you at Copyright problems as they appear to be copyrighted. If you can provide details please do so.

Image:Madhuri.jpg, Image:Dia.jpg, Image:Sanjalhaf2.jpg, Image:Akshay.jpg

Can you provide copyright and source details for the following images also uploaded by you :

Image:Shilpa.jpg, Image:Photo1.jpg, Image:Mallika.jpg, Image:Preity.jpg, Image:IndianNavyFlag.jpg

thanks. Jay 15:04, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:


 * Image:IndianNavyFlag.jpg
 * Image:Preity.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License,  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 07:22, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board.
Hi Dhoom! You might want to list yourself at Indian wikipedians' notice board. utcursch 13:08, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

Seeking you support
I am seeking your support and participation for starting the "Indian Collaboration of the Week". Please enlist your support on the page Wikipedia_talk:Indian_wikipedians%27_notice_board if you would like to support. Thanks Arunram 08:31, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Preeti Jhangiani
Hello! I hate to tell you, but this contribution is simply too short for inclusion. Can you possibly add more to it? Otherwise, it will likely be deleted. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 18:50, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image:Mallika.jpg
Burgundavia 23:10, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)


 * This file has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jay (talk) 23:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Movie infobox
Add a movie infobox with the movie articles u write.The template is Infobox_Movie and is available in wiki.Fill up every info u know.add posters if available. Dwaipayanc

revert dispute International reactions to the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict
Hi, There is an dispute in International reactions to the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. The dispute is over inclusion of the AIPAC reaction to a US House of Representatives Resolution expressing support for Israel. Various accusations are being thrown around by Comrade438 eg. im being accused of trying to paint a "zionist conspiracy".

Comrade438 has made few silly edits, and comments, along with what might be a threat. It degenerated to Comrade438 blocking the page without consulting WP:RPP, then reverting last changes. I am trying to alert other users who have edited the article to this dispute as I believe the detail should be included. Is it possible you can look and see if you agree that AIPAC's reaction should be included in the article? I dont believe its a content issue and is possible trolling. I previously highlighted the problems on wikipedian noticeboard 82.29.227.171 21:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Indian Navy article
You contributed to the IN article during the initial phases. Now it requires citation for this part. According to a report published by the US Congress, the Indian Navy could be among the top three navies in the world by 2009[citation needed]. Can you help.

Chanakyathegreat 03:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Category:Zee TV Shows
I have just nominated it for deletion; however, an alternative (with actual articles) now exists in the form of Category:Zee TV shows (with the lowercase). — Lenoxus 06:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Joanna Christie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 08:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:4781.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:4781.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nikhil Chinapa
A tag has been placed on Nikhil Chinapa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Indian Navy ships
Category:Indian Navy ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of INS Gomati (F21)
A tag has been placed on INS Gomati (F21) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Newt  (winkle) 07:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TrackGandhi


The article TrackGandhi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article which does not make a credible claim to notability for its topic

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skomorokh  00:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dhoom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tusshar Kapoor -
 * 2) Uday Chopra -
 * 3) Shamita Shetty -
 * 4) Malaika Arora Khan -
 * 5) Ashok Saraf -

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LakeCity Mall


The article LakeCity Mall has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)