User talk:Dhruvtantia/sandbox

Hi team Snowsol, I thought you guys did a nice job in explaining the scenario and writing a relevant IRAC answer. I believe your Neutral-voiced summary meets the Wikipedia rules as I do not see any editorial bias. But I have one concern regarding the source that you've cited. You've used a Wikipedia article as a reference (^ "Act of God", Wikipedia, 2019-11-16, retrieved 2020-03-31) which in my opinion is not a reliable source. However, I would recommend you to verify if we can cite a Wikipedia article as a reference for another Wikipedia article--Sanjana Obili (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC).

Nice Job guys! RexOmnipotens (talk 21:15, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

In your IRAC, I think your analysis might better be moved to the Rule section, and your first conclusion "The epidemic can be classified as an act of God because it is an unforeseeable event" should be your analysis. Also, I changed some small grammars, and I believe, your neutral voiced summary would be better if more reliable sources added to it. Team 8ChrisX120 (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)