User talk:DiRiN

The subject's claims about themselves are the textbook definition of "NOT a reliable source"
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to True the Vote. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  00:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I understand reversing the statement from the organizations website; however the sources statement that they are "perceived" as conservative because of their policies should not have been reversed. DiRiN (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * They are, according to all reliable sources, conservative. The article reflects that. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  05:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)