User talk:Di Bernardo

Recent edits to Deep Throat (film)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Deep Throat (film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Deep Throat (film), without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 16:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Deep Throat (film). Sundayclose (talk) 14:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Deep Throat (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 01:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your expert knowledge
Use of one's own knowledge is considered wp:original research and "should not be used on Wikipedia" (please read). Please read the Interaction/Help link on the left hand column of any Wikipedia page. I suspect if you make any further edits, you will be indefinately wp:blocked. I suggest you use a wp:edit request in the talk page of the article (see tab on top left of article). Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed. There are multiple policy violations: addition of unsourced information, edit warring, violation of WP:3RR. You're actually lucky that you haven't already been blocked. Three editors now have reverted you and issued several warnings, one of whom is an administrator. The overwhelming evidence so far from your edit history is that you are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. You're at the end of your rope. I hope you will finally heed all the warnings so you can possibly make useful edits in the future. This is not a bad place to spend some time helping out. Otherwise we don't want you here because you are causing far more harm than good. One more step over the line and you are out of here permanently. Think about it. Sundayclose (talk) 17:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please use an acceptable reference
See help:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes. You also need to give a good reason for removal of the existing reference in the wp:edit summary. Please do not add references to the edit summaries. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)