User talk:Dialects

July 2007
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MER-C 08:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kathleen S. Dunn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 10:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You can easily prevent deletion from happening by adding appropriate sources to your article. Additionally, your comment on the articles talk page can be seen as inflammatory. Considering that you have already been warned for adding promotional material, I would suggest that you tread lightly. (I have reviewed the content added which lead to those warnings.) Furthermore, judging by the fact that you have obviously tried to promote the subject of the article, I would suggest you take note of the following article and consider if you have a Conflict of Interest: WP:COI Andante1980 10:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * There is nothing stopping you from editing the page, but do leave the deletion tag in place and motivate your changes on the talk page, as you did before. If you can keep a NPOV for the article and provide proper external (notable 3rd party) references, then no one will object to it. As for notable third parties, I think IMDB and other large publishers satisfy that requirement. Andante1980 11:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, ofcourse, the functioning of the preview and save buttons is as follows: Preview will show you a rendered copy of the page, which is not committed to the database. The Save button will commit your changes to the database and make them available to the world. Andante1980 11:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kathleen S. Dunn. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 13:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox Link
Thank you for the Sandbox Link - Will Use!

Your edits
Please be aware that you should leave the tag about Conflict of Interest in place. This is to make sure other editors pay proper attention to this article. I have again added this tag to the page for Kathleen S. Dunn. Andante1980 11:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)