User talk:DianMo28

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Victor Lopes (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Jin Lu
A tag has been placed on Jin Lu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Victor Lopes (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Jin Lu has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tcncv (talk) 21:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Jin Lu
A tag has been placed on Jin Lu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Original Research re Nortel/brain drain
Your edits on the brain drain page seem to consist of original research (I am assuming you were the one who also made the edits under two IP addresses before registering this account) and the references you cited only tangentially refer to the topic you bring up (for example, you say that Nortel's bankruptcy evoked memories of the CEO's comments on brain drain years ago, yet your citations don't at all substantiate the claim that such a link was made -- they only talk about the bankruptcy and CEO's comments as independent events). Lacking any actual citations I have removed the content on the suspicion of original research. If you can provide sources which clearly make those connections, please feel free to undelete the paragraphs, this time citing those documents. --Colonel Cow (talk) 05:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)