User talk:Dianadawson

Original research and edit warring
The External link, and a quote from it, which you keep adding are not considered reliable sources here. Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research:


 * Dr. Aditya Sardana (aka Adidarwinian) is the first one in the history of medicine to name Samuel Hahnemann as the "Father of Human Pharmacology".
 * Father of Human Pharmacology – Samuel Hahnemann

Anyone can make a website and even self-publish a book. That doesn't make it worthy as a source here.

Also, your restoration of the material, after it had been deleted by another editor, is considered edit warring. I'm going to place a template below. It contains a warning, links, and instructions. Please read it carefully. If you don't follow it carefully, especially the part about BRD, you'll just get blocked. Stop adding that material and discuss this on the article's talk page. I'll open a thread there. Only discuss until a consensus has been reached with other editors regarding what to do with that content. We edit collaboratively here, and you will never succeed by attempting to force your content into articles. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Samuel Hahnemann
Your recent editing history at Samuel Hahnemann shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)