User talk:Dianagurman

tendentious editing
Having reverted the same text twice on Ethnic Cleansing related to an on-going conflict (ex) with reason "not in source" amounts to vandalism. For one, the term is right in the title. I encourage you to engage in a discussion on the articles' talk page if you have other problems with the text. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 15:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ethnic cleansing. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  17:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * == Introduction to contentious topics ==

(t &#183; c)  buidhe  18:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for editing in the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area after being warned that it is not open to new users, you have been blocked temporarily from editing Wikipedia. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Hi there! I can see that you're a new user; I'm happy to lift this block if you respond affirmatively that you're familiar with the notices that have been provided above. Editing in the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area rqeuires your account to have more than 500 edits and be more than 30 days old. Please also refrain from reinstating the same edit multiples, commonly called edit warring. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)